sovay: (Lord Peter Wimsey: passion)
No Publicity (1927) is a stupendous trifle of two-reeler silent comedy starring Edward Everett Horton, which was all the information I required to try it out and regret nothing.

Silent Horton would be even more of a novelty if I had gotten to know him first as the earnestly doubtful narrator of Rocky and Bullwinkle's "Fractured Fairy Tales" (1959–64), but thanks to my temporally ambivalent relationship with pop culture, it is a much surer bet that he introduced himself with Arsenic and Old Lace (1944), where his elastically flustered double-takes paid off the fretful set-ups of his lines. Kicked back a decade and change into a ganglier, go-gettinger, youthfully middle-aged incarnation, he's at once instantly recognizable and revelatory as Eddie Howard, the gamely gauche press photographer whom the intertitles inform us "would have gladly gone into the whale's stomach to get a flashlight of Jonah," which is about what it takes when his paper assigns him to steal a snap of an heiress well-guarded by a regiment of society dragons. Pertly modern with her bobbed hair and the asymmetrical dash of a single earring, Ruth Dwyer's Sally Lawrence wouldn't mind the publicity at all, but her conservative guardian is played by Josephine Crowell like all the aunts in Wodehouse rolled into one redoubtable bosom and Eddie immediately finds his polite, straightforward efforts complicating into such time-honored shenanigans as hiding in the drapes, impersonating an iceman, and imitating the action of a folding screen, inevitably culminating in a full drag escape attempt just as inexorably thwarted by the success of his imposture. "This is Sister Blue, who has come all the way from Kansas to lecture for us." Patently unable to think of anything "Wrong With Our Girls," but equally unable to sneak out under the expectantly clutched pearls of the guests of Mrs. Van Pelt, Eddie swathed in the dowdiest of bombazines and a feather-plated hat screws his pince-nez to the sticking place and launches into the bluest-nosed lot of nonsense until the enforcement of the Production Code.

Because so much of his screen persona as it solidified into the '30's exploited his knack for an old-maidish dither—of the stars of the lavender screen, Horton was one of the most enduringly implausible-undeniable—it is frankly charming that while Eddie can pass himself off as a temperance matron with little more than a roll of grey hair and one of his own demure simpers, his shotgun lecture owes more of its credibility to the attentional inertia of his audience which applauds the mere subject of the younger generation's turpitude even when improvised desperately from the wrong end of the stick. "I despise lip rouge, it has given painter's colic to more men and boys." His listeners are more suspicious when he relents on the rouge question than when he literally hangs on to his hat in the face of an electric fan or successfully passes off a madcap careen tangled in his own hems as a demonstration of the latest craze in "vulgar dance—the Ford-fender shimmy." I had known the actor could throw a wild take, but I had not properly understood it was part of a full-body repertoire of physical comedy which saw much less action even in the musicals of his sound career and here can't be missed from the moment he's so cheerfully focused on his latest experiment in photography that he almost ignites his editor with the flash. Shown the door for the first time by Mrs. Van Pelt under disdainful full sail, he packs his Brownie back into its cigar box with an insultingly diligent finicking of his fingers and saunters off with such ostentatious nonchalance that he seems to have thrown out one of his hips. He can't retrieve his hat from its currently occupied chair without being mistaken for a particularly brazen masher, but the topper of the offended dignity with which he dons its crushed platter is the slight philosophical shrug with which he almost immediately takes it off again. He may have been less of a stuntman than legends like Keaton or Lloyd, but no sooner has he emerged in his decorous drag than he pitches himself falsies over fundament down the curve of the stairs in a katamari attempt to recover a portrait which previously slipped his waistcoat; he spins out in a whirl of rucked skirts and garroting shawl and comes up with a breathless, incredulous wince at himself and his bright ideas, almost breaking the fourth wall in his side-eyed momentum. Sally rushes over solicitously, but we will shortly be signaled that she's more than the obligatorily pretty face when, bored out of her mind with the moral droning of the supposed Miss Delilah Blue, defiantly redoing her lipstick and slinging her shapely gams everywhere like the dapper flapper she is, she twigs to the game before any of the straitlaced company and flashes at once into co-conspirator mode, the proto-screwball assurance of a true match. They flee the house together, leaving respectively the red herring of a well-dressed hatstand and a maid covering for her mistress with a standee joke. They clinch in the flash powder fallout of his lovestruck distraction. It's a fast wrap-up with one last gag at the expense of the older, stuffier generation, but a surprisingly satisfying one. If you can't love a man for his drag act and his absentminded tendency to explode things, what's Cupid coming to anyway?

No Publicity was the first in a series of eight two-reelers produced for Paramount by Hollywood Productions, which is to say Harold Lloyd, thus explaining their survival when so much of Horton's silent career has gone the way of all nitrate. I am inexpressibly grateful for it: the actor truly has been one of my particular idols since childbirth and I had never seen him as such an uninhibited silent clown. I should have expected nothing less from a man who was thrown out of his first college for pranking his own suicide. The presence behind the camera of so many of Lloyd's regular crew makes it all the neater that the film doesn't feel mad-libbed from his own oeuvre, following its star's lead instead to its own distinctive, impish and beleaguered identity. For all its silent virtues, it's irresistible to hear Horton enunciating in his inimitably rattled fashion the triple-take subtitle of "W-e-l-l, I-er-I mean, well, no-I-yes about bad habits." I discovered this short on Dailymotion, but the whole series comes in a box set from Undercrank Productions and I hope to watch them all, especially since I am assured of a reteaming with the vivacious Dwyer, who looks practically new wave and utterly misplaced in a house accurately described as "one of the most magnificent cold-storage plants in Snob-haven." When she still thinks our cornered hero is the afternoon's tedious lecturer, she gives him a cross-eyed literal kiss-off, and as soon as she has him pegged as a picture snatcher en travesti, she glows. I was rather delighted myself. This shimmy brought to you by my glad backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Claude Rains)
I cannot really complain that Wendell Corey played so few heavies. Especially with his start in noir, his pale-eyed cat-looks could have typed him trivially as a hood or a psycho and it took a few years instead for his bread and butter of attractive second-stringers to circle around to the weirder, edgier roles intimated by his queer debut, though a shark-hearted studio fixer remained more of an outlier in his ambivalent gallery than even a resentfully racist chiseler or a grief-tranced murderer. The studio system of classical Hollywood has obstinately refused to take my memos that his gift for wry vulnerability should have lined him up for more romances. He's so good in "Poison" (1958) as a heel without the hint of a face turn, any moral alignment he felt like should have been lining up for him.

The best Iago I ever saw was the most convivial of his cast, a barrack-room lawyer of such irrepressible sarcasm and incorrigible sweet talk, it seemed paranoid until he started soliloquizing to suspect him of any successfully concealed enmity and if you were only watching his face, you still wouldn't believe it. So Corey's Timber Woods, rolling up to this hothouse half-hour of Malayan night like a lifeline for a man in the position of James Donald's Harry Pope, namely petrified for hours by the lethal weight of a krait on his stomach, scarcely daring to whisper or loosen his grip on the book he was reading when his uninvited bedmate slithered in. DTs and malaria ruled out after a reflective look at his partner's sweat-soaked face, Timber promises, "Okay, kiddie, I'll think of something." If he seems a little obtuse, a little distractible as he goes about the tightly beseeched business of hunting up the phone book and ringing the district doctor—718, he corrects himself apologetically now that he's got his glasses on—surely it's encouraging that he hasn't caught the piano-wire nerves of his partner, an implicit reassurance in his loose-jointed bonhomie that the man already stiffened in shallow-breathed corpse-imitation isn't in such fearful danger after all. It would be more reassuring if it weren't flecked with red flags like the dubious inspection of a knife, the genial concurrence on krait-related fatalities, the solicitous bending to soothe his partner's brow in a swirl of cigarette smoke that induces a tiny, choked, terrified cough. "Harry, be calm!" Timber shushes as virtuously as a nursemaid, as if he hadn't pushed for exactly that suppressed buck of a reaction from his providentially captive audience. If only he would drop the mask honestly, it would be easier to take than this Loki-drip of amiable malice. The more inflammatory his provocations, the more nonchalantly he smiles over them, some jokes or club stories he's recollecting to pass the time until the arrival of the doctor, who could always be too late: "You're not supposed to talk, remember?"

In the source material of Roald Dahl's "Poison" (1950), the title indicates the racism of colonial relations which springs out as venomously as a krait when at least the white reader is least primed to expect it. At once closely and inversely adapted by Casey Robinson for the fourth season of Alfred Hitchcock Presents (1955–62), the teleplay transfers the toxicity to the partnership of its two expatriates, once evidently a friendship as well as a business venture, now some kind of Sartrean hell. Its history is not particularly illuminated, but then it doesn't sound particularly unique—the never-seen girl who has come to favor one man over the other, the profits of the plantation which are worth a case of negligent homicide—some imperceptible point of resentment flipped over into real hatred, which is all that matters by this stage. Timber's is the more obvious, most impressively in his offhand boast that he started his partner on the drinking that with or without Schrödinger's krait could wreck his chances in business and love, but the suspicious impatience that grates through Harry's hoarse-clipped self-control suggests there may not have been so much love left to lose from his side to start with. Directed by Hitchcock himself, the episode is a near two-hander which sweats itself out in almost real time, claustrophobically pressed by the snake-breeding jungle outside the bungalow as by the human-thrown shadows within it. Everyone is fantastically hard-lit by John L. Russell, the veteran noir DP who shot most of the series and would garner his only Oscar nomination for Psycho (1960). Donald in frozen or grimacing profile is coated with a barbed glitter of stubble and perspiration, introduced with the constricted, serpentine gesture of one hand twisted suddenly into frame in tortured appeal. Corey wherever he roams with his ostentatious freedom is caught with his eyes transparent, as spooky an effect as orthochromatic film, the ice in the veins of his man-to-man jocularity. Spines of rattan, roof-ribs of corrugated tin, and joints of bamboo encourage the tropical production design without tipping into tiki cliché, especially the central set of the bedside with its pinion of crumpled sheets. A medico responsible enough to postpone his holiday in Singapore for this house call which is starting to feel like a head game, Arnold Moss as Dr. Ganderbai practically glows in his ice cream suit. Corey, of course, had worked previously with Hitchcock on Rear Window (1954) and feels at times like an entertainingly low-rent variation on one of his director's charm-surfaced villains. It's fun to watch his tricks of self-deprecation deployed disingenuously, as when he feints at dropping a syringe of antivenin and whips on the chagrin at a sharp look from Dr. Ganderbai; then safely out of sight over the doctor's shoulder, he can let his face break into a diabolically whimsical smile at the disclosure that the shot was more placebo than protection. His no-brows flicker like photogravure in their fine expressive lines, tilted merrily even when he's just admitted to something despicable. "So? So what now? And this little krait may yet turn into—what's the expression? A hand of God? Oh, in a very amusing disguise, of course."

The sting of the ending can be seen coming by all the laws of irony, but it gives a hell of a close-up shock, not even so much because it finally snaps the tension as because it is the first time all story that Timber looks what he mocked in his quondam victim—helpless, human—a glisten like sweat on his face from the drink thrown in it, the crash-zoom in on his ghost-eyes showing their agate of wide and terrified, translucent blue. We have observed Harry at just this merciless distance, but not his tormentor. Their voices have even turned tables, distorted against cool. The reversal lingers even after Hitchcock has closed out the episode on his host's customary, macabrely humorous note, past the punch of the obvious proverb. I am glad that adaptations more faithful to Dahl have been made since, but in its own right this one makes a hard little chamber piece. It made me superfluously happy to see Joan Harrison in the credits as producer and Norman Lloyd as associate producer. I hope it's considered one of the famous episodes. I worry it may not, since for reasons impenetrable to me and obnoxious, "Poison" is not currently available on any of the services legally streaming Alfred Hitchcock Presents, meaning I tracked it down on old-fashioned physical media thanks to the good offices of the Minuteman Library Network. The occasion was the hundred and eleventh birthday of Wendell Corey, notwithstanding that I already yelled at a dry stone wall for his sake. I had not seen quite this person in his movies and his radio voice gets the full workout, from a snicker to a shriek. If anyone ever promises to get you out of a predicament with his laissez-faire delivery of "Shake of a lamb's tail now, chop-chop," just risk the snakebite and rescue yourself. This amusement brought to you by my calm backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Rotwang)
A handful of shorts and a feature does not a marathon make, but it does give a person a solid evening of science fiction.

Mark Slutsky's Final Offer (2018) is a clever, generous two-hander with a premise worthy of Fredric Brown, namely that the fate of humanity in the face of interstellar expropriation rests with a scruffily hungover lawyer who scrapes himself off the floor of an elegantly appointed, eerily wall-less office to discover that he has five minutes to negotiate for the retention of his planet's oceans and spends most of them panicking. Since he's played with an infinite wince of flop sweat by Aaron Abrams, it would be unnecessarily rude to call him an ambulance chaser, but he freely admits that he wins most of his cases on no-show technicalities: "I do traffic tickets!" Anna Hopkins gives a practiced polish to the human veneer of his opposite number, the sfnal reality shock of her true form looming all iridescent streamers and eyes like mother-of-pearl out of Cthulhu: "I'm confident we'll get to a yes on this." The comedy of their corporate first contact comes from its earth-draining banality, but its charm shines when it exceeds its tongue-in-cheek brief and goes out not on the fine print of the punch line, but the much better twist of unexpected rapport, sincerely extended by a man so accustomed to losing, he doesn't need to be magnanimous to commiserate. It runs an adroit twelve minutes and had it been a short-short of the Golden Age, I could look forward to locating the fix-up novel. Wormholes and time scales may be a dime a pulp dozen, but the quick shot of the negotiator's business card with a fax number for the Virgo Supercluster is adorable.

As a complementary lesson in the pitfalls of science fiction comedy, the pilots of Jeremy Lloyd and David Croft's Come Back Mrs. Noah (1977–78) and Nigel Kneale's Kinvig (1981) make an instructive contrast, which is unfortunately not the same thing as a great double feature. The one appears to have been written by a team who didn't know very much about science fiction, meaning its already thin jokes are further slowed by infodumps and technobabble. Its funniest scene of a presenter chirping on about technological miracles while behind him three people grimly fail to open a tin of condensed milk doesn't need to be set aboard an unlaunched orbital vehicle in 2050. In a rare line that isn't cued to wackiness with retro-futuristic props, Michael Knowles helpfully kills a conversation: "It's just that if this blows up, there'll be Pontefract cakes all over Cairo." The other appears to have been written by someone who didn't know very much about comedy, meaning the satirical ambiguity of its extraterrestrial visitations washes out in the sitcom clichés of its marital boredom. Colin Jeavons salvages all of his scenes as a flat-capped anorak with a near-eidetic memory for every close encounter claimed in the UK and a dump stat of life skills, which may have insulted the fans who did not consider themselves interchangeable with ufologists and endeared him instantly to me. He jumps characteristically into a conversation with head-scratchers like "Well, what about the Great Pyramid, then? You given it any more thought?" The intrusion of a laugh track benefited neither show.

Mohamad El Masri's Other Other (2024) is one of the more ambitious and delicate short films of my recent acquaintance, a many-worlds interpretation of online dating which reveals its parallel conceit without once using the language of science fiction, relying instead on silhouettes and logistics and the eventual double-casting of Sosie Bacon and Scoot McNairy to draw out its meditation on the gulfs between our screen-bounded selves and the glitches of fitting together in three-dimensional space. It doesn't fuzz out into metaphor or enmesh itself in explanations of the elusive interpenetrations that allow a book or a key or a signal to cross where a door has someone and no one on its other daemon lover's side; it has the heft of a feature in half an hour, handheld as cinema vérité of a dream. Her spiky melancholy and his uncertain romanticism could bind or break them in the ordinary course of a relationship. The sleight-of-hand cinematography by Joshua Knoller cuts its lovers simultaneously together and apart, an eloquent incoherence: "I don't want to like solve all the like mythic mysteries that the universe dumps in my lap. I just am a person who's trying to be on this earth and just be." A more schematic, ironic screenplay could have been made of this material, but it feels true to its championing of messiness that the film as it stands in our reality is sweeter and more loose-ended, the hopeful blaze of its ending as vulnerable as the intimate digital distance of its original connection. It feels only a little as though the filmmaker is telling his characters literally to touch grass. "If we're going to do this, it has to be real."

Anthony Kimmins' Once in a New Moon (1934) is never going to be mistaken for a classic of British science fiction cinema. It has so many doubts about the genre literacy of its audience that it summarizes its thought experiment in the title crawl and gets such cold feet about its political implications that it reverses its sense of wonder for the finale. Bookended by these cop-outs, however, it is for the majority of its 63 minutes a herky-jerkily spirited quota quickie on the model of a cozy catastrophe: the fortunes of a seaside village after it is wrenched off the face of England and into an involuntarily independent planetoid by the fly-by-night gravity of a "dead star." More Verne than Godwin, the first half of the picture furnishes its hardest sf as Shrimpton-on-Sea orbits uneasily between the influences of the earth, the moon, and the close-veering comet and the resultant phenomena of slack tides, off-kilter constellations, time-lapse dawns, and finally earthrise are collated by the unlikely authority of Eliot Makeham's Harold Drake, the mild-mannered star-gazer of a postmaster whose one-day circumnavigation of the globe confirms its new designation of "Shrimpton-in-Space." Less Chesterton than Mackendrick, its second half satirically observes the celerity with which this island England crumbles into civil war, sparked by the complacent autocracy of Morton Selten and Mary Hinton's Lord and Lady Bravington and fanned by the agitation of sullen socialist Edward Teale—John Clements in his screen debut, thanklessly humorless at the fuzzy end of the love triangle. A free and fair election does not lead to a more equitable distribution of rations. A prim refusal of timber to the communal kitchens inspires a sortie to torch the manor instead. Freder-like, Derrick De Marney's Hon. Bryan Grant tries to talk some égalité and fraternité into his Blimpish parents: "Just because it doesn't work in England doesn't mean it can't work here!" Just in time to forestall the all-out class war, the deus ex runtime of the dead star splats Shrimpton back to the status quo of earth where all ideological differences can be overcome through the fellowship of the Royal Geographical Society. "What did I always tell you, Mr. Drake? Just a bad flood." I can't speak to the fidelity of any of the above to its credited source material of Owen Rutter's Lucky Star (1929), but it performs the B-prestidigitation of all seeming to belong to the same movie while it's rattling out, even if it separates into two or three different stories the minute the viewer takes a step back. It is a nice touch that before she is packed off into the romance which is a no-brainer between the well-mannered ex-aristocrat and the revolutionary wannabe, Rène Ray's Stella Drake sails around the unknown world with her father. The transit of Shrimpton is finessed with some stock storm footage and educational animation. The final gesture of lighting the beacon suggests more topical symbolism than the film was built to take, but then I am not sure it was built to take the democratically identified Bryan seriously advocating the adoption of socialism in space. I regret nothing about the time I gave it. I hope the Cinematograph Films Act 1927 felt the same.

I had no particular shape in mind for this collection of speculations—a Black Kitten Micro-Thon 2025? It is more than I managed last year. I found some of these items, [personal profile] spatch came up with others. It is a meaningful tradition to keep. There were no donuts, but Hestia was present on my lap for both watching and writing. This universe brought to you by my mythic backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Rotwang)
Ion Popescu-Gopo's A Bomb Was Stolen (S-a furat o bombă, 1962) would be the find of the festival if it played at an actual 'Thon. A deceptively lo-fi, black-and-white, dialogue-free doodle of nuclear anxiety, it was the live-action feature debut of its cartoonist-animator writer-director and it shows from the thesis statement of the nameless straight man played by Iurie Darie archetypally trying to pick a flower when he's chased off a nuclear test site by the ray guns of bucket-headed scientists whose military vehicles are polka-dotted like whale sharks, though the mushroom cloud which erupts in cathode-ray Droste effect is as scary as the real thing whose stock footage it is. Wandering the artificial streets of a city mashed up from American caricatures and Romanian economics, our dark-haired, lankily office-suited clown-hero folds the want ads of the paper over its atomically excited headlines just as obliviously as he stumbles onto the theft of the eponymous bomb—it looks like an enormous radish and its eerie heartbeat acts like radiation sickness—which shoved into his arms in an innocuous suitcase makes him the target of flamboyant gangsters and sinister authorities whom he evades in bewildered pirouettes of happenstance, his job-hunting knocked more immediately off course by his infatuation with the blonde bus conductor played by Eugenia Balaure whose no-nonsense sweetness is crystallized by her habit of playfully yet firmly breaking off the little white angel wings he moonily fantasizes onto her shoulders. Much of the film progresses in these amiable, inventive lazzi, accumulating until a pie fight is the only gag left unturned. The corporation which produced the bomb consults a supercomputer constituted of a cash register and a bubble-streaming brain in a jar. The gangsters frequent a basement den where a stripper peels by laundry line and their boss really doesn't like to be interrupted mid-tango. The hero gets the pants scared off him by a horror movie he can't afford a ticket to, the gurgles and shrieks of its soundtrack synched to the blood-curdling photo-comic of its lobby cards; he tumbles out of a dapper dream of his angelic bus conductor when someone opens the door he fell asleep against. Foiled in his initial efforts to return the suitcase to the criminals he aptly mistook for its lawful owners, he finds himself stuck with it like a bad joke no matter how often it's stolen or mislaid, irony-clad to boomerang back into his possession where in the finest tradition of the holy fool, his innocence of its contents seems to shield him from the dizziness it inflicts on its makers and thieves, but it remains an atomic MacGuffin and he cannot be protected from its nature forever. Fortunately for him and the rest of the ordinary citizens who have gathered fearfully around him in the deserted streets, the film's implicit argument about nuclear power vs. weapons of mass destruction can be solved with an optimism as boldly absurd as the paranoia that led up to it, snuffing an incipient explosion under a baseball cap so that the radish-finned bomb itself can be distributed in little, not even glowing bits among the pointedly multicultural crowd who use it to zoom stop-motion through the painted flats of their city and wrestle it back from the gangsters who would shoot it out of their guns; the last of it proliferates a pixilation of flowers through the dead field of the test site. It would be fun to see a print that wasn't so ground down with generation loss that at times it looks like Pixelvision, although the effect doesn't necessarily distract from the deadpan line-art weirdness of the film. It has overtones of Keaton, Tashlin, Tati, most of all its writer-director's self-described anti-Disney aesthetic in which the hazmat gear of the scientists still has the handles on the buckets. Since all marathon-related plans this year went down the storm drain the second our street started to look like the collapse of Larsen B, it was important for me to write about some science fiction. This bang brought to you by my biggest backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Viktor & Mordecai)
I admire the caliber of the performance given by Mel Ferrer in Lost Boundaries (1949) almost as much as his assessment that he shouldn't have done it.

It's not an insult, or a riddle. As originally documented by William L. White for Reader's Digest in 1947 and more fully in a short best-seller the following year, the source material for Lost Boundaries was the real lives of a light-skinned mixed-race family who had passed so successfully for white in legally integrated, not aboundingly multicultural northern New England that their children had reached adolescence without knowing it for themselves. Dramatizing this potentially exploitative material with a shoestring sincerity that simultaneously grounded and amped its challenge to the color line, the low-budget, independent production was in the vanguard of the cycle of race-relations pictures that flourished in mid-century Hollywood, the first announced and second released of four in its year alone. Such was its commercial as well as critical appeal that while it ran into high-profile censorship in Atlanta and Memphis, it did solid box office elsewhere in the American South as well as the more expected Northern receipts. It was screened in competition for the Grand Prix at Cannes and won for Best Screenplay. It is left as an exercise for the viewer whether the film would have enjoyed the same success of its moment had it more scrupulously avoided some of the period-typical compromises of its fictionalization of the Johnstons of Keene, New Hampshire, most absurdly and inevitably that none of the actors portraying the family was Black. Lest the modern audience imagine it passed without comment in the days of Jim Crow, the casting raised more than a flash of controversy, defended in some quarters as a tricky concession and called out as retrograde whitewash in others, a transparently cautious artifice which regardless of the reasons behind it risked reassuring the very anxieties it was intended to unsettle with the implicit claim that only whiteness could be credible as itself. Either way, it packed much more than the intended irony into its hero's optimistically innocent estimate of his future: "For one year of my life, I'm going to be a white man."

The casting of Ferrer feels itself like a testament to the national brain freeze in the face of multivalent identities. At the time when he was approached for the leading role of Dr. Scott Mason Carter, the restlessly extracurricular actor was an unknown screen quantity, chiefly employed within the studio system as an assistant director available for loan-outs, dialogue direction, and screen tests. His Broadway successes had been modest, his most prestigious work on the production sides of NBC and the La Jolla Playhouse. His own familial mix was Cuban-Irish and the deep-eyed, long-boned, lightly olive results got him effectively cast from a headshot. Even for the mix-and-match ethnicities of classical Hollywood, it feels a little outrageously on the nose to circumvent the vexed representation of passing with the non-Black non-whiteness of a Latino actor, but the unequivocal anti-racism of the part attracted him and he could communicate its ambiguities without recourse to panstick—as if to prove his third-alternative bona fides, he had last featured prominently as the white half of an interracial affair in the stage version of Lillian Smith's Strange Fruit (1945). It was not predictable, but it isn't a joke that his commitment to Lost Boundaries produced more than a tactful curiosity. Whatever melodrama adheres to the film around him, Scott himself never plays like a white image of mixed-race tragedy, sociologically problematized or sentimentally excused, as opposed to a specifically humorous, ambitious, stubborn and sometimes startlingly naive man who as we meet him on his graduation from the Chase Medical School of Chicago in 1922 has never let his good hair or his grade on the paper bag test affect his sense of self as culturally, ideologically Black. His affirmations of racial pride can sound a little pompous to colleagues who never had a choice about identifying as "Negro," but they stand in refreshing contrast to the repression of his in-laws whose assimilation into suburban whiteness—a house in Brookline before it was historically Jewish—allows them to treat their daughter's marriage to a fractionally darker-skinned man with almost as much disapproval as actual miscegenation. Collecting rejections from hospitals under no legal obligation to grant residencies to Black interns, he jokes with the cynical resilience of his fraternity brothers in Kappa Alpha Psi, "There are five railroad stations in Boston. It's a good place for a redcap. And if a passenger faints, my medical training will be invaluable." The accessibility of whiteness makes it a last-ditch reluctant fallback rather than an aspiration, a safety net that could strangle even as it teases the expediency of simply not saying anything, of letting the white gaze which imagines that it can tell Blackness at sight do the heavy lifting of lying for a man who has adamantly preferred to be recognized in his own skin. The accidentally sunk cost of the next two decades in fact becomes believable in part because Scott so clearly never thinks of himself as even conditionally white, crossing without code-switching between his country white practice in Keenham and the comfortable diversity of the Charles Howard Clinic in Boston. It is a plausible-deniable existence, possible because it's not supposed to be: "They don't have Negro doctors in New Hampshire." And yet the strength of his self-identification doubles as its own form of self-deception, an insulation from the realities of just how white his life has become, borne in on him in the film's nastiest, cleverest shock of his teenaged daughter unselfconsciously hollering through the house a racial slur that shudders the western union gentility of the script like a sonic boom. Not thinking of himself as the parent of white children, he has failed to ward them against the casual, radioactive absorption of normal American racism, especially in the super-Caucasian Granite State where their family may represent the total Black population of their white-steepled, tradition-proud community. It shames him as his non-disclosure conduct toward the town explicitly never does: he owes the white world no apologies, but his children deserved the truth. "I guess you might call it a twenty-year binge," he sighs to the old classmate on whose office couch he has fetched up as if coming off a bender instead of an interrogation, officially outed by his refusal to deny his race point-blank—"and what a hangover."

Recognition from Cannes notwithstanding, Lost Boundaries generally does not live up to its protagonist. Some of it is the rough edges of the homebrew production—the bare-bones budget was partly financed by the home mortgage of producer Louis de Rochemont and costumes and props are supposed to have been sourced from an appeal to the Seacoast public on WHEB—but more of it is script-level hackiness, notably whenever the treatment of race wanders from Scott and his complicated integrity. It is perceptive of the narrative to touch on colorism as well as racism, Beatrice Pearson's Marcia Mitchell Carter leafing through pictures of variously complected relatives in the last stages of her pregnancy, her anxieties about the cocktail of the next generation allayed by her husband's teasing of their pinkly crumpled firstborn, "He's all right, but he kind of looks like anybody's baby, though, doesn't he?" It is critical that it not confine its sympathies to its light-skinned actors, foregrounding in turn the dark, dignified contributions of Emory Richardson as Dr. Charles Frederick Howard, Rai Sanders as Dr. Jesse Pridham, and future acclaimed documentarian William Greaves with soul and charisma to burn as supporting MVP Arthur Cooper, in which context it does not feel like routine marginalization that the janitor at the clinic is played by Leigh Whipper. Particularly since the production consulted with both Ralph Ellison and Walter White, it is inexcusable for it to stick the Carter children with all the tragic mulattohood their father dodged. Like his real-life model, Richard Hylton's Charles Howard Carter hits the road to sort out his suddenly mixed self, but where Albert Johnston Jr. hitch-hiked cross-country through a kaleidoscope of personally rooted Black America, Howie bombs into a sensationalized, racialized lost weekend in Harlem whose sole silver lining is the disbelief with which the legendary Canada Lee's Lieutenant Thompson takes in the goal of his panicked slumming: "And you think that you can find that out in five days?" Susan Douglas as Shelly Carter gets one good line disenchanting her sweet gawk of a steady when he brings her "an awful rumor going around town about you folks," but even though it should be realistically ambivalent that she walks out of the reconciliatory finale of the Sunday service wherein the liberal authority of the Episcopal minister catechizes the rest of white Keenham into reopening their hearts to the Carters, especially since she has just dumped her white boyfriend it more reinscribes her as the latest imitation of life. Under the present world-historical conditions, it may carry an extra sting that Scott is stripped of his lieutenant commander's commission for no more disgrace than membership in a historically Black fraternity, but the notion that he could have been refused a placement at a segregated hospital because he too easily read as white smacks unconvincingly of bothsidesism. Even more so in a production committed to the documentary realism of location shooting and non-professional acting than in a slice of studio gloss, the casting of the Carters scratches like a wink to the censors, a fourth-wall warrant of boundaries that have not been so much as mislaid. One of the first-act walk-ons is Maurice Ellis of the 1936 Federal Theatre Project Macbeth. "You know what they used to say down South. If you white, you all right. If you brown, you can hang around. If you black, stand back," indeed.

In 1951, Ferrer gave an interview for the October issue of Negro Digest in which he discussed his role in Lost Boundaries: the responsibility that came with the part, the degree to which he had been identified with it, the importance of its reception among Black audiences, the caveat of his pride in the production. "I have always been self-conscious about having played this part . . . I have always felt that, ideally, a Negro should have had it, and not an actor playing a role." That he considered and could articulate as meaningful the distinction between representation and a role fascinates me as much as his willingness to state it on the record of a year in which it was manifestly not a Hollywood concern, discussing a production which had stalled on the casting of a textually Black part until a suitable hedge came across its director's desk; it doesn't sound like a humblebrag, either. Whatever Ferrer could channel through his own analogous sense of difference and the acknowledged assistance of what we would now call the sensitivity reading of his castmates, he understood it did not give him access to the Black lived experience. He played his role sincerely, not as a parody or a travelogue, and his trolling of white viewers who assumed from it that they had caught him out in an imposture of his own makes a supportive postscript. It is impossible not to wonder what Lost Boundaries would have looked like as a race film, or at least an independent production with more Black talent behind as well as before the camera. It exists in the hell of a good video store next door, the ghost-reflection of the Johnstons in a universe of different choices. Ferrer could have said nothing about the controversy either way and gone unremarked by the mores of his industry, but it feels frankly in character that he couldn't stay under the radar. I would love to know and have been able to find no information on how his performance was read by Latine viewers of the time.

The director who cast Ferrer was Alfred L. Werker, whose rather impressively racist comments during the casting imbroglio suggest a source for some of the Harlem hell-ride, although the divers hands of the screenwriters led by Virginia Shaler and Eugene Ling must take their share of anti-credit. The photography by William Miller, on the other hand, is a spindrift-and-picket-fences document of the Seacoast from the Nubble to the White Island Light, Keenham itself—compositely named after Gorham and Keene, where Dr. Albert Johnston Sr. practiced from 1929 to 1966—played by locations in Kennebunkport, Kittery, and the producer's home town of Portsmouth, all bound together by the march-of-time narrator pointing out "our old rambling mansions . . . our first citizens . . . our doctor." If it's true that Boston partly subbed for Harlem, it would be instructive to know which parts. The extras from the University of New Hampshire, from which Albert Johnston Jr. graduated in the same year as the film's release, were an apposite touch. Carleton Carpenter wrote and performed the jauntier of the film's two original songs, but the torchy number put over by Greaves was one of Johnston's own compositions, sneaking back into his own story. Somewhere in history a film is still waiting about him and his real-life road trip of self-discovery, which gave him no easy answers and got a Hollywood movie made. As for Lost Boundaries as it exists with all its heartfelt and uneven intentions, I caught it when it came around last month on TCM, but it plays with an endurable degree of blur on YouTube and the Internet Archive. It is not in several ways quite as much of an artifact of its time as it might be. This role brought to you by my invaluable backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Jeff Hartnett)
For just about six minutes, Grand Jury Secrets (1939) plays like the exact transitional point between collegians and fall guys in the screen career of Elisha Cook Jr., which is a fun claim to fame even if pretty much everything else the picture has going for it is the gimmick with ham radio.

It is not even slightly a proto-noir; it's the kind of light crime melodrama where a breezily confident shortwave enthusiast of a news reporter gets himself in the doghouse with his brother the assistant district attorney for jeopardizing the secrecy of a grand jury with his wireless tricks and has to make good by employing them to solve the mystery that the proceedings have banged a hard right into with the murder of one of the partners in the high-class bucket-shop under investigation. Otherwise the kind of ethically optional slacker who advises a newsie on a slow night to gin up custom with shouts of "War declared!" without clarifying it's on slot machines, he's so eagerly dedicated to the journalistic possibilities of the unencrypted airwaves that one of his wearied colleagues complains, "Bright Eyes is right, Johnny. Ever since you turned Marconi on us, working here's become a job." His lawful stickler of a brother decries his experiments with suitcase radio as no better than wiretapping or old-fashioned lo-fi peeping and our gonif of a hero regards them as no worse and certainly more efficient than posing as a fecklessly wealthy investor or a priest to get a scoop. His tactless crush on his brother's fiancée doesn't make a real triangle, but his mother is educating her in the slang that flies around the house like call signs: "It stands for young lady in ham lingo." None of it insults the viewer except for the alacrity with which it kicks its questions of admissible surveillance under the carpet of its happy ending, but it falls toward the thinner rather than weirder end of B-movies to begin with and keeps goofing itself up with clock-watching when its plot would trot out as smartly as a pre-Code if the film just let it; instead it has so little sense of pacing that the crucial murder plot hangs fire until the third act, speedrunning the miscarriage of justice which the hero has to be jerked up short on averting rather than exploiting. The MacGuffin of the prime suspect didn't pull the trigger on the crooked broker who blackmailed his father to the point of suicide, but on account of the actor behind the serious small-town youth who suddenly hauled out a gun and got cold-cocked before he could use it—waking, in a touch of personal noir that his film is too essentially straight to capitalize on, to be told that his inadvertent wild shot was fatal after all—while audiences of 1939 may have trusted to his innocence to save him from a first-degree rap, audiences any time after 1941 would bet the other way.

Just the thumbnail of this character suffices for the argument: Norman Hazlitt, doggedly claiming to have nothing to say to the authorities looming over him, clinging staunchly to a transparent alias even when the initials in his hat make him out a liar, so tight-lipped in protecting his parents from further scandal that he's taken for a hitman instead of a half-cocked kid, really looks like the missing link between the juveniles that Cook came off Broadway playing and his immortally luckless run as Hollywood's lightest heavy. "He's fronting for somebody, that's certain." Minus the wire-rimmed nebbishkeit of his student parts, he has a very young gravity facing off against his father's tormentor and his sudden fate, still learning to shiver; his flare of bravado under interrogation is as recognizable as the overstrained tremor in his voice as the gun whips out, but he isn't as high-keyed as some of the pigeons who'll follow him, even when he folds over in his cell in tears with the stupidity, the unfairness, and the bewilderment of the truth. "I didn't go there to kill him, Father. I only wanted to talk to him. I wanted to try to frighten him into letting Dad alone. He wouldn't listen to me . . . I had to tell it to somebody. I had to tell it to somebody or go crazy." He turns up his face defiantly, earnestly disbelieved; his actor will become more expressive with his hands, but even here they pick nervously over the brim of his hat until it's snatched away from him with the flourish of a courtroom gotcha and he can already hang his head as hopelessly as nobody's business. Even without his hair tousled from his crying jag, it's not hard to understand how Cook could have played adolescents into his thirties, emotionally all cluttered too close beneath the surface no matter the lines of familiar anxiety already starting to ruck into it. He looks even younger for the care with which he takes the little saint's medal from around his neck and entrusts it to the supposed priest, unselfconsciously tear-smeared for a gesture of bathos that he means with all his heart: "After it's all over, will you please give that to my mother?" I can't find that anyone noticed at the time, but now it pops like one of his signature shock-wide stares. Railroaded Norman is a device for the reporter to rebound his moral event horizon off of and he feels like the only real person in Grand Jury Secrets.

The ground zero for Cook's CV of fall guys looks like the brutally framed bellhop of Albert Maltz and George Sklar's Merry-Go-Round (1932), one of the short-lived plays for which the actor nonetheless garnered good notices before his breakout with Eugene O'Neill's Ah, Wilderness! (1933). Its plot as soon as I read about it seemed so stereotypically the sort of thing that would happen to an Elisha Cook Jr. character that I wondered if it had been in someone's memory when he was cast in the small, pivotal, wrongfully convicted part in Stranger on the Third Floor (1940), for whose early, expressionist noir his force ten commitment to victimization could have been tailor-made. Checking to make sure of a clear line of sight between the two productions, I tripped instead over Grand Jury Secrets—it seemed too convenient for the falsely accused young man left unnamed by the AFI Catalog to have been played by Cook, but by the power of the studio system which loved its easily slotted types, here we are. His pre-noir filmography had its share of jockeys and eggheads, too, but the thread of the shlimazl was the one that caught. In strict fairness, one could identify this quality as far back as his first real year in film with the four-eyed campus radical of Pigskin Parade (1936) who gets catchily decoyed into an arrest so that his academic credentials can be appropriated by a football hero, but the stakes are broad comedy and the excitable little agitator exits triumphantly convinced he's struck a blow for the youth of America. Norman Hazlitt is in real danger and even when the heel face detecting of the hero guarantees his exoneration of the crime he made such a sweet scapegoat for, the film runs out so fast, we don't actually see it: our last shot of him is that resigned, forlorn kid on his jailhouse bunk, not even knowing he just gave away an exclusive story with that valiant medal. In a movie which finds time it can't spare for a goonily pummeling hangover cure and the perpetual perplexity of the hero's picture-snatcher sidekick, a reassuring line of dialogue would have been nice and all but out of the question for an Elisha Cook Jr. character going forward. That he got to repeat his stage success in neither the film of Merry-Go-Round (1932) nor of Ah, Wilderness! (1935) just feels meta-insulting.

You're all right, but every time I ride in that floating broadcasting studio of yours, I'm afraid I'll be electrocuted. )

If you want the technical specs on Grand Jury Secrets, it runs the 67 minutes of a decidedly second feature for Paramount and was directed by James Hogan from a screenplay by Irving Reis and Robert Yost, original story by Reis and Maxwell Shane who as a writer and director would specialize in noir once it existed; its sets share the scrimped look of its runtime, but its DP was Harry Fischbeck who makes the shine of vacuum tubes count as much as the shadows. After Cook, the strongest characterizations go to Gail Patrick as the level-headed love interest and Jane Darwell as the CQ-conversant mother, since the women of this film are not slammed as far to the corners of the moral alignment chart as the oppositional brothers played by John Howard and Harvey Stephens, while William Frawley, Porter Hall, and Morgan Conway all hit their comical or villainous marks and Tom Dugan steals fifty seconds as a waiter who correctly diagnoses that the big-talking reporter has never ordered champagne before in his life. "It tastes like spoiled cider!" There are cute touches throughout the script, such as the sign in the press room which has been hand-edited to read "If a Man Bites a Dog It's News It's His Own Fault," and then at a moment of sincere callout it commits the blenderized metaphor, "The world's your oyster and you're going to milk it dry." I had never before seen the technique of paging an audience member during a movie by sliding a subtitle across the screen, nor had I realized that Depression-era cars could sport the precursors to bumper stickers. Mostly I had not known about Elisha Cook Jr. in this film and it makes me happier to have found him, even in a truly sketchy format. Hindsight makes a joke of the headlines shouted in the extra-extra montage after the murder: "Mystery Youth Slays Broker . . . Boy Killer Hides Identity." He might be the most recognizable face in it now. This front brought to you by my certain backers at Patreon.
sovay: (PJ Harvey: crow)
I come not to bury Jack Bernhard's Decoy (1946) because it would just dig itself up again. This Z-budget artifact of block booking does not suffer from good taste. It is barely impaired by morals. A generation before the ascendance of sick humor, its plot is a pile-up of macabre and preposterous kicks in the head, culminating in a stinger so feel-bad, it actually is funny, the mic drop of nihilism attributed to so many noirs and accomplished by so few. It has a real feeling of doom, a phosphorescent unwholesomeness, and it opens in the scuzziest truck-stop restroom committed by Golden Age Hollywood. I am extraordinarily fond of it.

I can't even slate it for its femme fatale when Margot Shelby (Jean Gillie) is a figure of such irresistibly surreal avarice, it seems only respectful that the film should not escape her insatiable event horizon any more than the men she adds to her string and cuts lethally loose when she's through. Behind door number one, we have career robber Frankie Olins (Robert Armstrong), who turned himself into a three-time loser just to keep her in style and now awaits his turn in the gas chamber in the aging faith that she'll spring him in time to reap the luxuries of his secretly stashed $400,000. Behind door number two, right-hand double-dipper Jim Vincent (Edward Norris), signing on to her scheme to locate said lettuce in the chauvinistically misplaced confidence that he's calling the shots as opposed to so far behind the eight-ball, the audience can already hear it rolling up on him. Door number three opens onto the disadvantaged street where Dr. Lloyd Craig (Herbert Rudley) maintains a charity practice on his days off from prison doctoring, but his noble-minded naïveté peels off him like paint at a whiff of Margot's $75 perfume, the sum of his honest week's pay. Even Sergeant Joseph Portugal (Sheldon Leonard), the kind of sturdily streetwise flatfoot who rescues jailbait from mashers, pays for his bar snacks along with his beer, and drops his ubiquitous nickels in the tin for Yugoslav Relief, hovers on the edge of her harem in reluctant admiration of her total freeze-out of the law. Stripper-like as he watches over his half-eaten hard-boiled egg, she provocatively adjusts the cuff of diamonds on her wrist to glitter the gulf between his plainclothes scruples and her shameless glamour: "Do they have this kind of trash on your level, Jojo?" In a contractual sort of fashion, the film offers a motivation for her money-hunger, a childhood of industrial poverty which she sees distastefully reproduced in the doctor's street with its slum panorama of laundries and liquor stores, its gutter-playing urchins she strides brusquely past as if their ragged baseball shouldn't even bounce through the same air as her mink. "That street runs all over all the world. I know because that's the street I came from, six thousand miles from here in a little English mill town. But it's the same rotten street, the same factories, the same people, and the same dirty little grey-faced children." It's like trying to impose psychological realism on fire. What Margot wants is unremarkable, the ticket-taker and the cigarette girl and the audience who shelled out for the double feature all want it and so do we, eight decades on and it feels even less like a joke that a working stiff is just a corpse that can't afford to get off the clock. How she wants it cannot be explained by social factors. She wants like a Schwarzschild radius, like K-capture, like Kelvin zero. She wants like a contagious haunting, so that even men she's never met are scythed collaterally down by it, the driver of an armored car, the driver of a hearse—Liebestod is for chumps, it's cash on the death's-head that makes this world go round. What a vanitas, though. Between soft waves of red hair, her fine-boned face has a hard translucent pallor, as if faintly fever-sheened with its own cupidity, the crisp caress of her voice draws out a phrase like methylene blue until it sounds like an aphrodisiac and not the key to an audaciously lurid plan, not after all to rescue her lover from the death house before the whereabouts of his loot snuff it with him, but to reanimate him after execution and get it out of him then. "It'll cost plenty," she warns her co-conspirator, "and it's a long shot," as briskly as if she had just proposed a spot of bribery instead of jaw-dropping Grand Guignol. Margot, the original girl with the hungry eyes. That undiscovered country had better cough up and fast.

How do you think I should use my face? )

I cannot make this film sound any better, weirder, or worse than it is. It's bleak and bonkers and looks like it was shot with a flashlight and a piece of cardboard where most B-movies at least tried to spring for two. At 76 minutes, it could be double-featured with a Senecan tragedy or a whoopee cushion. Eddie Muller paired it with the Corpse Reviver #2. It was the one collaboration produced by the brief marriage of Bernhard and Gillie and as the lankier morgue attendant whistles in admiration of his own mispronunciation of dichotomy, "Ain't that a lulu?" I saw it for the first time shortly after moving to our current apartment, when I was in no condition to try to convey its effect of an entire bookcase of pulp falling on the viewer, but it was most recently disinterred by TCM and is otherwise impressively difficult to find on the internet in legal fashion, which means that if you would like a ludicrously morbid pick-me-up, you should find it however you need to, only please leave the tire jack in the car. "Just this once, come down to my level." This trash brought to you by my singing backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Jeff Hartnett)
I gave it the old college try. It gave me the old army game. It seems I just don't like Cover Up (1949).

I don't mind that it isn't a Christmas noir. Whatever the advertisements of its hard-boiled title and the gun-drawn silhouette of its credits, its runaround is compactly established as soon as Sam Donovan of Federated Insurance (Dennis O'Keefe) steps off the bus in idyllically Midwestern Cleberg to spend his Christmas investigating the apparent suicide of the least popular man in town. Per double indemnity, that $20,000 policy doesn't pay out if he really shot himself—ditto if one of his beneficiaries did it instead, although Sam's read on the Phillips case is professionally routine. "With any luck, I think I might be out of here by tonight." What should have been a done-and-dusting interview with the folksily leather-jacketed Sheriff Larry Best (William Bendix), however, makes it clear that the visitor with his gallant armful of packages and the citified flair of his paisley scarf is in for the Summerisle treatment, his most upfront questions deflected and deferred with a plausible-deniable civility that leaves him in possession of a minimum of evidence and a maximum of suspicion. The coroner is out of town for the holiday, the jeweler who discovered the body hedges the details, the undertaker lets slip a discrepancy in the forensics and the sheriff offers his own Luger as cheerful exhibit of all the ex-servicemen's souvenirs that could match the minimal ballistics, opining meanwhile on the slow-burning merits of a pipe over a pack of impatient cigarettes. The dead man's niece wants none of the money, double or not. Not half an hour in town, an incredulous Sam's clocked his B-picture's premise: "Looks to me like this guy Phillips was murdered. In fact the whole town knows it and nobody seems to care!"

The merits of this set-up are not nil. In particular, the Christmas of it all lends an extra sheen of unease to Sam's almost complete inability to make any headway on the Phillips case, the more agreeably because it's done almost without irony. As pastorally as the town is sketched with its bell-ringing Santa and wreathed storefronts and season's greetings exchanged by neighborly name, the insurance investigator is efficiently a loner who lives for his job, characteristically dismissing a comment on his chain-smoking with the ergonomically glib, "I know, it saves a lot of time." Encouraged to relax for the holiday, he tucks a package back under the office's carefully baubled mini-tree with the awkwardness of a touched nerve: "Sounds great . . . Only I haven't got any folks and my home's wherever I happen to hang my hat." Even before we learn that he isn't natively an urban sharpie but a displaced small-towner himself, the appeal of Cleberg to Sam is Hallmark-transparent, especially with the meet-cute guide of Anita Weatherby (Barbara Britton) attuning him to its homespun rhythms one movie date and tree-lighting at a time. Her father is one of its leading citizens, her younger sister boy-crazily enchanted with the newcomer, the maid as tartly unimpressed with him as if he'd been calling for months. Anita nudges him that he flirts like he's selling a policy and a freckle-faced kid twists around in his seat during the newsreel to ask if they're going to kiss, which even better than gee-whiz matchmaking turns out to be a hustle for bowling money. "You know, I haven't done anything like this in years," Sam marvels at the end of the night, sounding as surprised by his own unstressed sweetness as by the archetypally wholesome environment that fostered it. "Movie, soda in the corner drugstore, walk your girl home, kiss her goodnight—" It's a readymade family Christmas, straight off the cover of The Saturday Evening Post. It's the most wonderful time of the year and every lead he pursues on his dogged rounds dead-ends in someone lying to an obviously ludicrous degree. A gun vanishes, a fur coat burns. The film really isn't folk horror, but the stonewall of his welcome produces something of the same parallax of coziness and creep, above all the ease with which an outsider could just fall into the place prepared for him and can't let himself so long as no one's giving him a straight answer—the only one of the townspeople even willing to acknowledge the kayfabe is a conflicted Anita and she's so direct and distressed in her plea to drop the investigation, she plainly regards it as more of a threat than an unsolved murder in the placid, prosperous haven of her post-war home town. Sam reiterates his commitment to the truth regardless of consequences; without the city slicker's romanticized respect for the white picket life, he's not afraid of turning over rocks or spinning up the rumor mill. Genre-savvily, he teases the convenience of one suspect to his face, plants a false item in the evening edition of the trusted Gazette in order to flush out another with the specter of a chemist coming from Chicago to extract a definitive clue from the damp-dried carpet where the killer of Roger Phillips stood. He's not a fool, even if he's had enough wool pulled over his eyes to make an ugly sweater. But he's up against the implacable niceness of the American dream and it's stymied more powerful men than Sam Donovan, who after all was just supposed to fill out some paperwork and depart as procedurally as he came. Being played by the noir-tempered O'Keefe does not transitively endow him with a badge or a blackjack or any real leverage beyond stubbornness and sarcasm. "What is this, Sheriff? No report, no gun, no bullet? Maybe he isn't even dead."

Some folks look at it like it was the first good deed he ever did. )

I first encountered this film in 2018, since which time it has received a restoration courtesy of the UCLA Film and Television Archive and it does look mint, especially when the cinematography by Ernest Laszlo allows itself to layer a few shadows into the shine of silver paper chains and holly. Nearing the end of his five-decade career, director Alfred E. Green encourages the playfully ambiguous tone to bloom in the banter between Bendix and O'Keefe and Britton, but I have to conclude that I am just much more at home to feel-bad holiday movies than O'Keefe, who pseudonymously co-wrote the screenplay with Jerome Odlum as the first effort of his own production company, Strand Productions. TCM ran it as part of their Christmas marathon, but it seems to exist regardless of seasonality on Tubi and YouTube. The emphasis on double indemnity is cute, as if the 1944 film slightly traumatized the entire life insurance industry. I am fond of the hero's ruefully self-bestowed epithet: "That's me, Sam the unexpected." It could have applied a little less to the wrap-up of his film. This murder brought to you by my merry backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Default)
I can't believe this year is over. I can't believe this year. I maintained my website and my presence on AO3 and wrote new work and was kept too much from sleep and it does not feel like twelve months either way.

I published two new pieces of fiction this year, both of importance to me:

"Twice Every Day Returning" in Uncanny Magazine #61, November 2024.
"Hyperboloids of Wondrous Light" in Not One of Us #81, December 2024.

Some new poetry, the same:

"Hagstone" in Not One of Us #78, March 2024.
"Penis Secrets of the Anunnaki" in Nightmare Magazine #141, June 2024.
"The Same Fur Coat" in Strange Horizons 8/5/24 , August 2024.
"Fair Exchange" in Not One of Us #80, September 2024.
"A Long Time Afterward" in Nightmare Magazine #144, September 2024.
"Amitruq Nekyia" in Strange Horizons 10/7/24, October 2024.
"Sheela-na-Gig" in Weird Fiction Quarterly Fall 2024: Masquerade, November 2024.

A couple of meaningful reprints:

"The Choices of Foxes" in All in Among the Briars: An Anthology of Mythic Wonder (ed. Julia Rios), June 2024.
"Sheela-na-Gig" in Weird Fiction Quarterly: Holiday 2024, December 2024.

I wrote one piece of fanfiction that made it as far as AO3 and left the rest of the fills in place:

"One More Game of Chivalry" (The File on Thelma Jordon), January 2024.

I wrote painfully so much less than I wanted for Patreon:

Easy to Get (1947), January 2024.
"Man on a Mountaintop" (The United States Steel Hour, 1961), February 2024.
Channel Incident (1940), March 2024.
Foreign Correspondent (1940), March 2024.
Rear Window (1954), March 2024.
The Forty-Niners (1954), March 2024.
Why Girls Leave Home (1945), April 2024.
The High and the Mighty (1954), April 2024.
T-Men (1947), May 2024.
The Big Trail (1930), May 2024.
We Who Are Young (1940), May 2024.
Dunkirk (1958), June 2024.
The Kiss (1929), June 2024.
The Lottery (1969), June 2024.
The Falcon and the Co-eds (1943), July 2024.
To Kill a King (1980), September 2024.
The Phantom Light (1935), September 2024.
The Girl Who Couldn't Quite (1950), September 2024.
The Keeper (1983), October 2024.
Watcher (2022), October 2024.
Tank Patrol (1941), November 2024.
"Hung High" (Gunsmoke, 1964), November 2024.
Lake George (2024), December 2024.
Exit (2012), December 2024.

I cannot say at the end of this year that we are all still here: we lost Autolycus. But you must say that Alexander lives and reigns or his siren-sister will wreck your sailing and Hestia was sharing slices of lox with me earlier this evening and I want the rest of us to stay that way. Happy New Year. A healthy, a safe one. Mir zaynen af tselokhes.
sovay: (Renfield)
Daniel Zimbler's Exit (2012) closely follows its oft-anthologized source material by Harry Farjeon, which means it's a twelve-minute creep-out for Christmas accomplished through the softly radio-tested expedient of simply speaking something dreadful into existence, or out of it, as the case may be.

The smartest tweak of the screenplay from the short story concerns the character of the mysterious Mr. Geeles, on whose supposed knowledge of "de-creation" rests the difference between a good fireside shiver and the queasily seamless reweaving of reality. "Well, it doesn't interest me to bring a rabbit out of a hat. I'm more interested in the process of putting one back . . . I should put it back so completely that you would never have had it at all." On the page, he's a more conventionally sinister figure with his watchfulness and his disconcerting voice, his papery age itself a kind of memento mori at the double holiday of a Christmas wedding. Played with genial modesty by the robust white-haired Julian Glover, Mr. Geeles on film is disarming rather than offputting, a family friend of a vintage such that the bride's uncle can remind the younger generation a touch mischievously as well as instructively, "He's been to places you couldn't even imagine. Seen some queer things." He's introduced absently brushing off a spill of brandy, the quietest of the seven guests left to pass the time in the grey-watered afternoon until the newlyweds with their hands inseparably twined and their eagerly teasing argument about settling in the country or the city depart for their honeymoon in Paris; he's heard from first in an affable attempt to redirect the best man, whose toastmaster jesting has slipped a personal gear since the ceremony and is grinding the conversation to awkward halts. He has none of the stonefish overtones of Farjeon's Geeles, lying in wait to unsettle. If anything, he seems content with his peripheral part in the company, an accustomed witness to its coziness and frictions, which makes it that much weirder for his center stage to involve, to begin with, a matter-of-fact explanation of the distinction between a murder, which still leaves behind the traces of a life, and the process whose theory he outlines, which emphatically does not: "You would be sponged from the page of human history. Not even your memory would remain."

Where are you? Who are you? Who were you? )

I would have read Farjeon's "Exit" in one of the innumerable school anthologies in which I was always supposed to be reading some other story—neither the author nor the title stuck with me, but the conceit lodged like a bad dream, instantly recognizable decades after the fact. Its own history is slightly elusive, broadcast before it was published and co-credited in both instances to Joseph Jefferson Farjeon, although without access to any earlier version I have no idea what the text of the short story was "adapted for broadcasting" from. There does exist a one-act play, but its script was not apparently used the one time the material was adapted for television. What blows my mind is that it never seems to have been adapted as a radio drama. As a short film, a short story, even a short story read out over the air, there is a protective layer between the incantation of the process and the audience, the fourth walls of third person omniscient and mise-en-scène. Done straight for radio in unquotated voices, there would be nothing to stop the audience from being included automatically among the number of people who might disappear just from listening to Mr. Geeles, which is so existentially freaky that it seems impossible no one took advantage of it. It is an almost definitional voice-in-the-dark story. It is a tribute to its strength as an uncanny narrative that it makes such a good film when it could have scared the pants off its audience just by handing a copy of Best Broadcast Stories (1944) to Julian Glover. DP Adam Etherington gives the location shooting at Layer Marney Tower the flatness of a washed-out winter's day, the most unnuminous of lighting schemes, but at the height of the process splits briefly, engulfingly into a kind of lepidopteran psychedelia, sound-designed by Alexa Zimmerman and co-edited by Zimbler and Ulysses Guidotti as if its containing shadows have been sliced out of time. The music by Fabian Almazan is somber and wandering, the same color as the tapped-out light until it darkens. The small cast is rounded out by Maggie Robson, Edward McNamee, and Keith Hill, but Coleman struck me so vividly with his face like a snide faun's and his admirable commitment to a Gulf spill of brilliantine, I was chagrined to discover I had last seen him as Ponder Stibbons in Sky One's Hogfather (2006); it made me feel I owed him a film unrelated to Christmas. This one I got from Vimeo after re-reading the short story, its nightmare fuel unimpaired. Of the Farjeon siblings, Harry was the composer, but if he had to make one literary contribution, what a beaut. This process brought to you by my best backers at Patreon.
sovay: (PJ Harvey: crow)
Lake George (2024) is a neat, wry, bittersweet neo-noir that earns its prefix more for its production dates than for any presto-chango twists on its source genre, which was after all the most skeptical, disillusioned, and sometimes subversively sympathetic of classical Hollywood. With a few allowances for the Production Code, it could easily be a first-generation noir as it criss-crosses a modern, sun-twinged California in which none of the essential building blocks of low-level crime have changed since the days of Dolores Hitchens and Ross Macdonald, however drastically telecommunications have globalized from candlesticks to iPhones and the Red Cars given way to the Glendale Beeline. It comes alive in its own right in the commitment and surprises of its leads, the character actors it showcases in the best traditions of the B-film, where losers, liars, and weirdos could command just as much notice as the heroes of the A-list. It may have been written as a love letter to those lives on the margins, but it never feels like a pastiche of them.

Nor does it feel like a deconstruction even as it taps and tweaks at its apparent archetypes, since even noirs of the 1940's were capable of toying with their fast-forming conventions and exploded as much as they reified as the canon freewheeled on into the 1950's. When a reluctant ex-con finds himself unable to pull the trigger on the resourceful ex-moll he was strong-armed to dispatch and subscribes instead to her counter-proposal to clean out the crook who's been pulling both their strings, the audience may be counting down to the drop of the fatale-sap penny, but for goofy, rueful, luxurious stretches, Lake George genuinely doesn't seem to care what twists may be on its horizon so long as it can inveigle its audience into a road trip where panic attacks, donuts, and the sun-setting salt gold of the Pacific count for as much as cracked safes, coitus cringeworthily interruptus, and bullets. The two-hander is worth the ride. Despite the Dietrichson blonde of her hair, Carrie Coon's Phyllis more mercurially recalls one of the dizzily round-the-block dames of Jean Hagen, freely admitting that she met her ex-partner in organized crime in rehab. "I thought I was a coke fiend! Nose like a Dyson." No sugar baby in her mid-forties and a denim boiler suit, she turns a loose-limbed cartwheel among the dune scrub and stages the photoshoot of her own burial with the critically judged splatter of an exploitation director and after point-blank capping a dude, briskly talks his girlfriend out of the mutually assured destruction of dropping a dime with one arm comfortingly around the younger woman's shoulders as if she were actually solving a problem instead of compounding it. If she doesn't suggest the sustained attention of a long con, her compulsively scattergun tactics get r-selection results. With such all-embracing cynicism that it amounts to positive thinking, she asserts cheerfully, "Everybody's playable." From the other end of the double act, Shea Whigham's Don regards her with one of his brilliantly microsurgical deadpans, a Wallace Ford-esque fireplug of regrets kept so close to the vest, the explanations for them may no longer matter as much as their desaturating effect. "I got in over my head and did something stupid." He's almost a pained joke of a goon, this chunkily middle-aged, white-collar stiff with his lame arm and paralyzing surges of panic, retro-kitted out for his unwanted job with a .45 and a champagne-colored 1983 Mercedes-Benz 300TD that coughs a conspicuous plume of black smoke when revved up, its windshield perpetually wiper-smeared in rather the same way that its driver, his more-salt-than-pepper hair wind-flopped, in a brown suit that did him no favors even before he started sleeping nights in it, looks simultaneously disreputable and square. His erstwhile target squints at him as if she can't quite believe in his obstinate reality: "Jesus Christ, you're like some nervous insurance salesman." Just throwing them together generates the friction of an odd couple that is all the more appealing for sidestepping any temptation of romance, but turning them loose on a heist which proceeds less in stages than improvised hiccups gives them the time to bond over more than their debts to Glenn Fleshler's Armen in his athleisurewear and million-dollar-view McMansion, their evasion of Max Casella's Harout with his red tassel loafers and triggerman's ready M9—mutual life-saving, whatever, disposing of bodies, a classic, days on the road and nights in motels, it's either talk or fall out, but the burger that Phyllis makes Don eat, because it is understood that he often forgets to, his blood sugar crashed, and she tipped him into full-bore freakout when she was just trying to throw him a normal scare, is better than a soulbond. $200,000 goes nowhere near as far in this recession-ridden century as it did in the post-war boom, but the fact that Don offers half to cash-strapped Phyllis when she had built it up as his bribe leaves her sincerely lost for words, no defenses against no-strings fairness. The mysteries of their tarnished pasts and present reliabilities hum through the film like tires down the asphalt sinewaves of Route 101, but the engine is the fragile, adult rapport through which his dry sense of humor emerges in tandem with her impulsive kindness. "Feel good about it?" she psychs him up as they cruise their first stash house. His comically honest answer is "I rarely feel good about anything."

The film knows its noir geography, too. Catching the 7 bus at the corner of Colorado and Verdugo grounds the action as documentarily as the digitally dotted towers that have thickened the skyline of Los Angeles, a meal in the parking lot of Grizzly Bear's Burger or the tables out front of Ossy's Bakery. "Two views for the price of one," Armen boasts of his red-tiled terrace beyond which the metropolitan grid runs out to the smog-veiled mountains, before blaming Don's fuck-up for keeping him out of the higher price bracket of Beverly Hills. The most unexpected violence occurs in the sunlit suburbs of Goleta and Thousand Oaks, in the kinds of houses which have little succulent gardens by the front door and relegate a stuffed swordfish to the wall of a garage cluttered with bungee cords and paint cans, but when the screen filled with the skull-pale boulders of the Alabama Hills, I golf-clapped to the slight disruption of the other three people in the theater. The shout-out to Lone Pine in the sign for the Trails Motel could be a nod to High Sierra (1941), but in this house the respite of Lake George itself, floating the same stratospheric blue in its ring of pines as the sky over the Sierra Nevada, is more likely to evoke the escapism of lakes and mountains in Johnny Eager (1941). Cinematographer Tod Campbell lets the day scenes flood with natural light, often striped through the dust-flecked windows and solar-tinted windshield of the station wagon which serves as more of a home for our antiheroes than any of the Eisenhower leftovers of their one-night motels, and shoots most of the night scenes with a rich sheen of sodium like the reflection off a safe's worth of gold bars. Without grotesquerie, it's the cheap, transient, lonely edges of Americana familiar from so much noir, which will never go out of style so long as characters in whom we can recognize our own losses and yearnings wash themselves out of their lives for one reason or another, drugs, disenchantment, a weakness for the ponies. "Sometimes you have to do shit you don't want to do." These chipped and weathered people, answering something in one another that isn't just greed or lust. Her obfuscating motormouth and the one full-throated fuck! he lets out in deeply humane frustration. His peculiar, battered dignity and her matter-of-fact confidence that has the desired effect even when it's flim-flam. The late-lit, wrinkled waves at the foot of Ellwood Mesa are shot as meditatively as their faces, washed side by side in cloud-skeined sea breeze. Whether a pile of skimmed, scammed cash is the best way to get it or not, who doesn't want to believe in Don saying for the first time without bitterness to Phyllis, "I guess we both can do better."

I saw Lake George at the Somerville Theatre, which I guess goes to show that I will leave the house in slithering rain for the right kind of noir even if it doesn't contain Van Heflin. It was the first new movie I had seen in theaters in just about five years and seems to stream on a variety of usual suspects for the convenience of the home viewer, though if someone asked me to program a series of neo-noirs that don't get hung up in the Venetian blinds, this one would most definitely get an airing at size. It was written and directed by Jeffrey Reiner, who seems to love film noir for its philosophy more than its tropes, and I don't even care that like some of its studio-system ancestors it jinks just a little on the way to its elegantly reflective ending. I must now fervently hope it is not the only time I see either of its leads carrying a feature. This insurance brought to you by my rare backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Jeff Hartnett)
Elisha Cook Jr. does not appear until the last fifteen minutes of "Hung High" (1964), but he is such a gosh-darn delight that he walks off with the episode and despite the co-starring presence of such other luminaries as Ed Asner and Robert Culp, well he should.

Being more conversant with the original radio version of Gunsmoke (1952–61) starring William Conrad than with the epic television run of Gunsmoke (1955–75) starring James Arness, I have no idea how normal it is for the latter's Marshal Matt Dillon to find himself in the kind of predicament in which he enters the town of Jetmore, namely framed for murder by one gang of villains and escaped from another equally ready to see him hang for it and facing the prospect of a double showdown with nothing more on his side than the horse he rode in on, but it is welcome standard practice for syndication that an apparently incidental idler on the porch of the sheriff's office should be played by a legendary character actor, meditatively chewing on a matchstick and answering questions the stranger hasn't asked yet. "My name's George. You don't have to tell me yours." He has the philosophically tatterdemalion air of a silent clown in his scuffed derby and ragbag coat and modestly explains himself, "I'm a bum. Every dollar I get, I spend on hard liquor. I'm the most worthless fellow you ever saw," having just cold-read the incognito marshal like a frontier Holmes, casually identifying his quarry, appraising his situation, and preemptively assessing his next move all without sounding like it's any skin off his own nose. "Well, a man like me, he's got to have some talent, don't he?" It's a marvelous turn by Cook, especially since it gives his second-guesser's voice and his anxiously crooked face—further creased by now with decades of crimes and capers never working out—to a character who seems impossible to fluster, correctly forecasting the marshal's chances of selling his horse or buying a gun, unceremoniously ejected from the saloon to dust himself off like an indignant cat and report back the information successfully gleaned by his wistful loitering. The slightly incredulous appreciation with which the mountainous Matt regards his diminutive donor figure may be shared by the audience, all the more as it becomes clear that there's no twist or catch to his cooperation unless casting against type counts. In his mild-mannered, alley-stray fashion, squinting thoughtfully at a man who's in worse trouble than he thought, George is rock solid. He produces a couple of hard-boiled eggs from nowhere and nicely salts them to share, throwing in with a gunless marshal against a known trio of stone killers with a lackadaisical shrug and an afterthought dash of luck over his shoulder: "I ain't doing nothing today."

Cook doing comedy at a slight existential tilt should not surprise anyone who ever caught him as the resigned screenwriter of Hellzapoppin' (1941) who just wants to grow up to be older, but the effect is usefully off-kilter in "Hung High." The episode to this point has been notably tough for a small-screen Western, leading with the back-shooting murder of one of Matt's mentors and escalating into the cold-blooded hanging of the man who did it, an inventively grim centerpiece staged like dark-humored horseplay right up to the point where it sets a shadow swinging across the sudden tableau of a stage-greyed, coolly vindictive Culp holding a stoically outraged Arness at rifle-point: the scapegoat hanged in his chains as the marshal is left cold-cocked and whiskey-drenched for the cavalry who aren't coming to the rescue. Gunsmoke in its radio incarnation had been famous for its bleak, immersive treatments of Western themes, pushing its revisions of its quintessentially American genre as hard as anything onscreen in its decades and in some cases, thanks to the latitude of its medium, further. Ten unprecedented seasons in, expanded to an hour-long format but still shot in black-and-white, its TV counterpart could demonstrate that it had not become totally domesticated, which means that sharp-eyed, self-effacing George is an instantly endearing character whose actor's dust-biting track record combined with the real, sordid violence on offer braces the audience to lose him in some redemptively heroic or just poignantly stupid fashion. Score one for averted clichés. Whatever his weaknesses where liquor is concerned, he's got nerve enough for a front-row seat to a bar-clearing gun brawl and loses none of his offhand, offbeat helpfulness in the aftermath, patting soldiers who chose the right side—at one point there were three—encouragingly on the back as they take their directions from a newly reinstated, tin-starred and gun-belted Matt, whom he gives a decent space of authority before half-admiring, half-scolding, "You took an awful chance." It's no surprise that Elisha Cook Jr. got a broader range of roles in television than the gun punks and fall guys of his formative film career, but it's still a pleasure to see him so comfortable, raggedy, steadfast, with a surprisingly elfin grin when he wastes no time accepting an invitation back into the bar, plenty of business for his beautiful hands and looking the whole time like some kind of penniless clurichaun. "I'll wait outside," he reassures Matt on the steps of the general store, settling down with his matchstick for exactly as brief a time as he expects.

I got this indelible little sketch from Pluto TV and I have to say that watching it in between episodes of Bonanza (1959–73) and The Virginian (1962–71) did give me a touch of tonal whiplash, which should be taken as a credit to writer and series co-creator John Meston and then-fledgling director Mark Rydell. Seeing as Elisha Cook Jr. made four episodes of Gunsmoke, I'm sure in at least one of them he did something criminally doomed, but I still celebrate him when he turns up as an eleven o'clock show-stealer, cockeyed on the side of light. This talent brought to you by my traveling backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Sovay: David Owen)
Since I went to the trouble of tracking down Tank Patrol (1941) for Bill Owen, I appreciate it giving him a particularly pointed broadside of anti-fascism even for the Ministry of Information.

Except for its technical detail of a Crusader Mk I, Tank Patrol is not among the more innovative products of the MOI, framing its rousing vignette of a knocked-out tank crew resourcefully regrouping to break out from behind Italian lines as an instructional lecture from a sergeant in the Royal Armoured Corps on the importance of a well-manufactured intercom. Any backchat from his audience of overlooked turret welders is exchanged almost instantly for the gallows banter of the crew in the vast grit of the Western Desert, evaluating their scrapped-up situation with succinct disgust: "What a life, eh, Tiger? Lost, out of gas, stone motherless broke and far from home." They wedge the tank out of sight in a sand-drifted cave and soften a berth for their front gunner who took almost as hard a hit as the intercom and the wireless, feverishly mumbling as he's field-bandaged so that the driver has to lullabye him for lack of better drugs and then clap a hand over his mouth before he gives them away to the little rustle outside that's an issue of Corriere della Sera blowing in on the dry night breeze, an unwelcome sign of just how close the encamped enemy must be. Their hull gunner can see the perimeter of sentries when he reconnoiters over the nearest dunes, a loop of oasis ringed in crates and troop trucks. It looks to their commanding sergeant like the staging for an area attack, but with some luck and nerve—and the windfall of a prisoner of war in his invaluable grigio verde and bustina—like a plan for getting hold of the petrol without which even their loader's down-to-the-wire fix-its won't get them back in the fight, let alone to their unit. At least they have been established in the kind of propaganda that is more positive reinforcement for our girls in the machine shops than cautionary tale for our boys in khaki drill. "You get some tea ready and share out the bully. We'll save the chocolate for an emergency."

Nonetheless, because he was played by an actor of interest to me in his screen debut, I worried about George the front gunner for most of his 37-minute film, especially since he had so little to do in his introductory scenes beyond wince and twitch in delirium and look almost impossible to move without further injury, a stiff-blanketed little effigy gently supported by one of his mates for a mouthful of water from a tin mug, the sweat beaded like oil on his corrugated young face. Even when he starts talking in clear sentences, he's still flat on his back in the flicker of a makeshift paraffin lamp. His grudge could be personal with all that white gauze knotted under his shirt, but as the camera dollies in on his refusal to make nice with their prisoner, unyielding as if he's staring down more than a fellow soldier's scruples, he makes its politics crystalline:

"I've had some of these Fascist beauties before when I was working at sea. When you're on top, they'll come crawling like a dog. But blimey, when they're on top, God help you. I seen these blackshirt boys in Genoa, bashing their own people over the head. When I was on that East Africa run, I heard a little of what they did in Abyssinia when they got their flamethrowers busy. When I was running food into Valencia, these Caproni boys used to come over and bomb us night and day. They killed two of my mates. Don't talk to me about Fascists."

What makes this speech more than a recruiting catalogue of atrocities is the interaction that touches it off. Beyond the popular aria he was humming when picked up on patrol, the Italian prisoner is not presented with especial caricature—he's referred to as derogatorily as the rest of the Royal Italian Army, but as played by London-born variety artist Nino Rossini, the long-faced truck driver from the 26th Light Armoured Regiment "Porcospino" comes across mostly as an average squaddie out of his depth, uncertainly fluent in English and inclined to sit tight until he can see what his British captors want of him. He is not identified with any particular campaign such as could assure his participation in war crimes. Nor is he personally offensive, a stand-in for his castor-oil state: the set-to starts because he's sharing cigarettes and snapshots of home with the loader who duly admires the other man's children and says approvingly of their surroundings, "Seen country like that back home in South Africa." The humanitarian outreach just hits a bit of a blast mine when George glances at the picture he's proffered as encouragingly as a postcard and points out the "nice big picture of Mussolini on the wall, too." The prisoner defends Mussolini as a "great leader," draws himself up proudly in his shirtsleeves and knee-fort of blanket to answer the question of whether he's a Fascist, "Of course!" It's a totalitarianism too late to recover the conversation after that. Their prisoner may be an amiable fellow, a doting father, and almost certainly doesn't want to be motoring around the sand-fly rock-flats of Libya or Egypt any more than a British tank crew, but the moment he affirms himself as a Fascist, not merely by uniform but ideologically, George has no more time for him and transitively neither should we. The slightly shocked loader attempts to smooth things over, "Oh, well, gentleman only wants to be friendly," and George snaps back as sharp as he'd do it, considerately blanked for the tender sensibilities of a U certificate from the British Board of Film Censors, "The gentleman only wants a punch on top of the –– nose!" In fact, despite the decisiveness of his rebuff, the gentleman will exit the film without ill-treatment beyond a slight case of impersonation and a share in a daily brew-up that debatably counts as a breach of the Geneva Convention. His regiment is another story, its convoy of men and munitions more than fair game for the triumphant resurgence of the refueled Crusader with all its plugs and valves in talkative order and its guns thumping the two-pounder tune of "And give 'em this one with the best wishes from good old London town . . . right from Port of Spain . . . one from Jo'burg . . . and Coventry . . . and Birmingham . . . and Plymouth . . . from the whole British flaming Commonwealth of Nations!"

Tank Patrol was produced for the MOI by the Strand Film Company, one of the independent documentary units of the 1930's which propagandized prolifically throughout the Second World War; it was directed by John Eldridge and written by A. L. Lloyd, which I thought at first must have been a false cognate for the folk singer and then after I had read that he trained with the RAC as a tank gunner and wireless operator before being seconded to the MOI, reconsidered because of the sense it would make not just of the overall scenario, but specifically of ex-merchant seaman George, anti-fascist before it was patriotically popular—a blockade-runner for the Republicans in the Spanish Civil War, for the love of the left wing. It's a tantalizing K-hole. Dave Arthur in Bert: The Life and Times of A. L. Lloyd (2012) discusses his subject's pre- and post-war radio career, but makes no mention of any involvement in film until the 1950's. More problematically, Bert Lloyd didn't enlist until 1942 and wasn't tapped by the MOI to write for the Russian-language weekly The British Ally until 1943. I got this film from the Australian War Memorial where its four reels loosely strung together with flickery leader are dated 1941, which is also the production date given by its object record in the Imperial War Museums. American trade mentions treat it as a recent release in 1944 and Denis Gifford's The British Film Catalogue: Non-Fiction Film, 1888–1994 (2000) places its initial exhibition in October 1943. The IWM's British Official Films in the Second World War: A Descriptive Catalogue (1980) lists it as homefront propaganda of 1941. To clarify nothing, Bert Lloyd is credited as a contributor to the MOI's Life Line, a traveling exhibition about the Merchant Navy first mounted in 1941. It's appealing to imagine he had a hand in the film, especially with its scraps of Caribbean singing and Australian reminiscence, even if I suspect that the Italian rank and file stationed in the Western Desert would have had popular songs on their gramophone as well as classical stuff by Caruso, however ironically cultured a soundtrack it makes for the violence of the commander's one-man raid. The Commonwealth cross-section of the five-man tank crew compels less of my attention, partly because I've seen Leslie Howard put the same point over more numinously and inventively, but it is neat that the screenplay thinks to include, along with Bill Elliot's Australian hull gunner, John Martin's South African loader, Owen's Battersea-bred front gunner, and the generically officer-class British commander played by Norman Williams, a driver from Trinidad and Tobago, even if Jorge Juan Rodríguez is ethnically ambiguous enough not to risk the question of a mixed unit. He has apparently brought a machete to a 40 mm fight and it serves him well. Skeptical of the red-sauce accent employed by Rossini, I was delighted to find him a cut-glass straight man to Tommy Fields. As for Owen, his first essay in the archetypal working class is convincingly harrowed and then charmingly resilient when he finally sits up on his own with his grease-grimed face and his hair falling every which way to chime in on a homesick conversation. "Port of Spain, eh? When I worked on the tankers, we used to run in and out of Trinidad, carrying oil for Liverpool. I'm glad I ain't on tankers now," he concludes with cheerful self-deprecation for a man who almost got himself blown in half on maneuvers in North Africa, "I'm no hero." His willingness to turn a cold shoulder to even the mildest-mannered of fascists makes him look like one. It seems extraordinarily unfair of the credits to misspell not only the actor's name—having not yet changed it at the behest of the Rank Organization, he's supposed to be Bill Rowbotham—but the character's. With that kind of attention to detail, God knows if the screenwriter even was an A. L. Lloyd. At least they knew the right direction to throw a punch. This meeting brought to you by my political backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Renfield)
I seem to have enjoyed Chloe Okuno's Watcher (2022) most as the film it wasn't actually, but I did enjoy that film quite a lot.

Written and directed by Okuno from an original screenplay by Zack Ford, Watcher floats much of its runtime as a chilly, attenuated study of isolation and intrusion, a slowly crystallizing certainty that may be a self-locked loop of paranoia or the wages of awareness as a woman in the world. Beyond the streaky-blonde, sloe-eyed model-looks of the acting career she left in the U.S., Julia (Maika Monroe) has reason to feel conspicuous. Newly transplanted from New York to Bucharest, without a job or connections of her own she's an ornamental pendant to her husband's promotion within the advertising agency that gives her loose ends of hours until he returns from the office a distinctly retrograde flair, days spent in half-hearted tourism, practicing her language lessons in internet cafés, nights aimlessly scrolling on her phone, idly drinking wine in a tight crimson slip of a dress like a pin-up forgotten by her photographer. The window-wall of their spacious, impersonally tasteful flat makes a theater of the outside world, a terrarium of her not yet home. No matter how affectionately he nuzzles her into sex on the dim-lit couch and texts her goofy snaps of her face mashed against the pillows the next morning, Francis (Karl Glusman) too easily closes his wife out of conversations she can barely grasp a word of, interprets reluctantly as if he's making excuses, as if it embarrasses him to have brought home to his mother's country this anti-trophy of an unassimilable American. "What did he say?" Julia is always having to ask. "What did she say? What did you just say?" The coolly profane, pixie-punkish hospitality of her stairwell-met neighbor Irina (Mădălina Anea) is frankly a lifeline, but even the solidarity of repeating du-te în pizda mă-tii can't dispel the suffocating sense of surveillance she's been trying to push off since the jet-lagged insomnia of her first night in Bucharest, when her eyes tracking across the much dingier, more Brutalist block of flats across the street found the same figure staring down from its rain-curtained window that had earlier watched her struggling with her luggage from the taxi. Night after night, she sees the pale tilt of his face, his sodium-backed silhouette. Without a clear look at him, she can't prove that he's the same man who sat directly behind her in a nearly deserted cinema and paced her stride for stride down the echoing aisles of the local supermarket, but she doesn't doubt it herself, only when she has to explain it to politely unconvinced authorities, mumbling in her self-consciousness of how trivial the complaint sounds: "He's always in there, looking in here." The already inaccessible city feels even more hostile now that she knows that the skirl of emergency lights she passed one night with Francis was the dump-site of a throat-slashed woman, the latest in a unsolved string of serial kills. Ea este o femeie frumoasă, her first lesson in Romanian drills as if in collusion with the taxi driver who complimented her with the same word, really complimenting her husband on his beautiful wife. Cross-legged on her darkened bed, Julia drags on one of the cigarettes she quit months ago until it flares as ironically as an eye in the shadows, the numbing culmination of the fear she just tried to disprove: "I waved at him . . . and he waved back."

The film is its queasiest and most compelling when it runs with this cat and mouse of gazes, obviously riffing on Rear Window (1954) in its exploration of the tantalizing, dubious entitlement of strangers to one another's lives, but successfully staking out its own pitch with the sick-joke suggestion that the strongest connection Julia may have formed in her rudderless culture shock is the one she wants the least. Even before her husband fails her in any of the ways that even non-terminally dickish men so often let horror heroines down, she deflects his curiosity away from the tight watch she has begun to keep on her watcher with the vague, self-dismissive, "Just people-watching." Required to ID her man in order to file a formal complaint, she shies away from a face-to-face confrontation, but as soon as she spots him crossing Piața Roma in the grey morning after—the same dark-haired, drab-jacketed figure captured grainily on the supermarket's security tapes, carrying one of its plastic bags like a blind date's book—with inevitable turnabout she begins to stalk him. Watcher isn't a supernatural film, but it plays a little tongue-in-cheek with its codes. The angular, slump-shouldered silhouette of her watcher imprinted itself so reliably onto Julia's nightscape, the sight of him abroad by day has, on top of the normal creep factor of stalking, the uncanniness of a shadow peeling itself off a wall, a mannequin blinking. She clocked him first in the movie theater, as if he seeped out of the menace of claw-handed George Kennedy threatening wide-eyed Audrey Hepburn in Charade (1963). The Dracula tchotchke she purchased as a semi-gag gift for Francis rhymes with the tabloid coverage of a killer who beheads his victims, who has been dubbed Păianjenul, the Spider, so that she can catch a stack at the newsstand bannering Încă o Victimă în Pânza de PăianjenAnother Victim in the Spider's Web. Following her nondescript mark indeed weaves her into the city more purposefully than her earlier, drifting, discontinuous forays, as she descends into the history-carved underground of Pasajul Latin to emerge on the other four-lane side of Bulevardul Ion C. Brătianu where her watched-watcher is absently feeding a cloud of pigeons before rounding the corner of Strada Lipscani in the tram-tracks of Linia 21. He eats alone under the awning of a self-serve café, shielding himself from the intermittent rain with the makeshift of a newspaper. Tracked to a subterranean strip joint with the high-minded name of "Museum," he isn't one of the patrons sprawled complacently in front of the hot-lit glass cabinets of the peep show where the girls spread and grind to the trancing pulsations of synth-pop, he's the cleaner wrestling in a back room with a mop. The nervous gulps of the cinematography by Benjamin Kirk Nielsen and especially the quick, avoidant cuts by Michael Block keep his accumulated sense of threat from defusing entirely, but he does seem small fry for the intent predation of Julia, stalker-anonymous herself in jeans and an outdoorsman's windbreaker, particularly once she goes farther than his hijacking of public spaces and investigates the burnt-bulb shabbiness of his own fifth-floor address, an incursion that backfires so predictably that his counter-call of the cops on her would be farcical except for the heart-jolting freeze with which she reacts to the introduction of Daniel Weber (Burn Gorman), full-face, in focus, up close for the first time. "So if you both can agree that this was a misunderstanding and that it's not going to go any further, we can all go on with our lives?" Julia regards him with such aghast revulsion, he really could be a vampire, extending one hand across her threshold to rules-lawyer himself inside. It's a moment of double vision as disorienting as the initial approach in the cinema, which fused real and silver-screen frisson: the camera which racks like hypervigilance sees his long fingers wrapping around hers as if claiming them and sees also a thin, downcast, middle-aged man who barely makes eye contact, in need of a shave. Being a wiry wet cat of a dude has never disqualified a murderer, of course, but this one is so recessive it's hard to imagine him exerting the effort to bag a woman's head in a pillowcase, much less saw her living neck through; to the incredulous six-foot-two Francis, he is an instantly unbelievable threat. He doesn't even speak, reserving the tell of his voice—dry, fluent—for a late-night encounter on the Metro like one of those urban dreams in which the trains do not move, the darkness stretches on forever, the city is deserted except for the dreamer and her nightmare. Quite reasonably, his tight-lipped deadpan matched to her tapped-out terror, he starts to explain himself: his meager life circumscribed by the care of his ailing father, his distraction of spying on other, more interesting lives; his illusions of reciprocation dashed so harshly, he considers himself the wronged party in their prickly, invasive pas de deux. "I know it is a sad hobby," he admits, less in shame than in resignation, "but no one has really noticed before." His target audience is only half listening, mesmerized by the knobbly weight of the supermarket bag on the seat beside him, whose smiley face might be stretched across the oddments of shopping or the features of a severed human head.

The scene itself is crackerjack, but the film that builds up to it is equally careful with its balance of banality and horror in Daniel as with its balance of insight and anxiety in Julia. How should she not feel panicked and abandoned, left to her own devices in a city where women her age are turning up in pieces and her partner can barely muster the attention from his accounts to ask what she needs from him, not that she'd trust him any longer to provide it? Her set jaw and dark-drowned eyes make her a scream queen on a short fuse, angrier than she wants to acknowledge with the churning boredom from which choking dread does not count as a break. "Maybe I've always wanted to live an aimless existence in Bucharest, smoking cigarettes and scaring my neighbors with my hysterics." Her opposite number goes stoically about the rounds of his all too dutiful existence, a self-admitted sad case with his solitary meals and his literal mop-up job, but there's a closed, terse quality about him that keeps him from reading too comically or sympathetically, plausibly tone-deaf to her distress in redressing his own. His little flicker of a smile reaches his eyes without inhabiting them. "I don't control the trains." Crucially, he doesn't have to be an innocent to leave the hum of unfinished business in the air like a third rail. If Julia was mistaken in her spiraling conviction that her peeping tom of a neighbor was a serial decapitator of women, she read the red flags right that he was a stalker, however motivated by a loneliness and entrapment she could could recognize; he made her feel desperately unsafe when she was already at sea, when this odd man out should have understood her better than bewildered, impatient, obliviously normal Francis. It's the near-miss sting of their conversation in the halted metro car, the one string of truth underneath an unforgivable joke. "At least I have the Spider to . . . to keep me company? . . . At least I have that."

Do I need to leave so the grown-ups can talk? )

Watcher was the feature debut of writer-director Okuno and despite my feeling that we wanted slightly different movies out of it, the one that exists is spare and striking and inclines me to check out her shorts. Bucharest at the dead end of winter looks partly like its real city, partly like an immigrant's nightmare of itself, a veneer of surrealism in supermarket labels which are not yet all familiar, weather out of step with the accustomed rotation of the year—it feels like tourism when Julia gets chased out of the neoclassical wheel of the Romanian Athenaeum, but by the time she comes aboveground at Apărătorii Patriei, like beginning to learn the patterns of a place. Since the film pointedly eschews subtitles in order to alienate the viewer as much as its heroine, I was entertained to find that I can catch a random scattering of Romanian from reading the poetry of Liliana Ursu and Latin and suspect it is even more fun for Romanian speakers. I am not reconciled to the fact that discovering Burn Gorman with Pacific Rim (2013) produces similar results to imprinting on Peter Lorre with Arsenic and Old Lace (1944). Fortunately I own a DVD of Charade and can watch the screwballier bits with Cary Grant in addition to the parts that are proto-Wait After Dark (1967). Watcher itself can be found streaming on the usual suspects and made a change from my usual range of horror film, where the watcher would almost certainly have been a vampire. This web brought to you by my uncertain backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Haruspex: Autumn War)
The Keeper (1983) is pocket hauntology, a one-room two-hander that packs its half-hour with explicitly immensurable time. Its plot is that paranormal evergreen, the ghost-hunters who find their quarry and so much the worse for them, but as it plays out in the stone-time cosmology of Alan Garner, they should have been so lucky as to wake the dead.

From its start, the teleplay does not align us with the human disturbance of the tranquil decay of Beacon Lodge, the colorless slanting of a winter afternoon through ivy-scrawled panes across a floor of sticks and rubbish, every sign of dereliction from bare shelves to jutting beams except for the fire that danced in unswept ashes as if newly laid, the one unbroken chair drawn up to the hearth as if vacated just a moment before. It doesn't look like a place where anyone has been living, yet it does not look unoccupied. Rattling the door to come in, Peter (Tim Woodward) and Sally (Janet Maw) register as gate-crashers rather than guests, bundled like hikers with the paraphernalia of their psychical overnight which they unshoulder to take in the chill, littered, open-roofed emptiness: "What a shame, letting it get like this!" From restless coverts of the house, we regard them as doubtfully, a couple so obviously mismatched, they make a natural pair, him gangling and fairish, still cheerful to believe after six fruitless investigations, her dark and compact, skeptically prepared to enjoy a self-spooked night. They unfold their camp beds, share a thermos of coffee, make their first, mundane observations. By the time night has fallen without a glimpse of spirits beyond the contents of their glasses, Sally is teasing her earnest, embarrassed partner, "When I said I'd come with you on this jaunt, I expected a little more of a run for my money," as they sit up by the artificial campfire of a storm lantern. "You might find it here," he returns with a hint of storyteller's malice, before relating the ill-starred essentials of this nineteenth-century gamekeeper's lodge that make it sound like a miniature Hill House, a locus of inexplicable misfortunes long predating the suicide that emptied it of active tenancy in 1912, its peculiarly formal abandonment following the 1960 sale of the estate. "There's always something been here . . . That's what's creepy. There's no ghost. But my grandmother was never in doubt," Peter concludes, a mischievous, telltale admission, the origin story perhaps of his paranormal interest: "If ever any house was haunted, this one was. Or is." The riddle hangs on the air like the curious whiff of smoke, reminiscent of herbs, even incense, Sally caught for an instant as she moved around the cold-hearthed half-ruin, how can there be a haunting without a ghost? The audience with the advantage of a share in the darting, creeping camera that peers through the caged ribs of wainscoting and across both sides of a Scrabble board as if everywhere and nowhere at once may have their suspicions, but as Peter warns with apt and unconscious irony, "It's best to keep an open mind."

Considered as the mystery of a classic ghost story in which the cause of the haunting contains the conditions for its expiation, the short slow burn of The Keeper plays by Golden Age rules in providing its characters with the necessary clues, though their susceptible rationalism makes it anyone's guess whether they'll interpret them correctly in time. Certainly it feels unwise of Sally to chafe her arms and mutter, "Oh, come on, house, if you're going to," especially without checking whether it already has, but the night is wearing on in the click of tiles and the scratching of pencils and Peter's good-natured grousing about her triple scores and the most notable anomaly recorded so far at Beacon Lodge has been an incongruous rise in the ambient temperature, not so much that its mortal lodgers aren't still huddling into their coats and scarves over the last of the coffee, but definitely not the eerie heat-theft that presages the spark-gap transmission of the dead. Even as they compare their personal theories of haunting, neither of them gives much thought to the competitive acrostic of their game—cuckoo, love, west, window, nest, lodging, go—until it leaps out in exquisite corpse relief as the skeleton of the folk verse apparently written by Sally in lieu of her intended correspondence, an act of mutual, unwitting psychography that makes irreversibly clear how literally the strangeness of Beacon Lodge has gotten under their skins:

Go from my window, my love, my love,
Go from my window, my dear;
For the wind's in the west and the cuckoo's in his nest
And you can't have a lodging here.


Prior to this point, the house has been no more unwelcoming to its visitors than any historic structure half pulled down and left to rot the rest of the way, its bare walls offering the shelter its stripped roof denies, but now as if in vehement underscore of the song's instruction they are assailed by all the sense-wrenching phenomena a parapsychologist could dream of, a windless storm that beats them to the ground in one another's arms, an audible smash of glass intact in the bobble of a torch-flash, a terrible deep-sounding tread that clangs at the door and drags itself across the vanished floor of the upper storey and down the inaccessible gap of the stairs and in the finest tradition of stone tapes, on the cassette that Peter frantically plays back it's nowhere to be heard, only their own captured human confusion and fright. His pedantically point-missing deflection that "Cuckoos don't have nests, anyway" has as little effect as breaking the connectors of the tiles. Sally has already intuited that the plug can't be pulled on this haunting so easily. "We're being used. I'm being used," she breathes in dismay, the letter-writer dwarfed by the looming slats of the chair still turned toward the silent hearth, its perspective dissolving over her shoulder as her pen began to scrawl across the page. Her round face in its cup of bark-brown hair floats like a mask in the paraffin light, a pressure of darkness behind it: "I can feel it. Absorbing. What are we doing here?"

Who are you? )

The Keeper was the third and last of Garner's original one-shots for television anthologies, in this case ITV's Spooky (1983), the precursor to Dramarama (1983–89) under whose banner it was released on now inevitably out-of-print DVD; I watched it despite an aggravating, glitchy muddiness on YouTube and the tight direction by John Woods, the restive cinematography by Albert Almond, and especially the skittery, antique score by Gordon Crosse, rattling the nerve harp of its hammered dulcimer, suggest that even younger viewers who had made it through Children of the Stones (1977) or the catalogue of Sapphire & Steel (1979–82) could have hit this programme and bailed on the entire concept of TV. I thought I had discovered it last month after To Kill a King (1980), but it turns out I was rediscovering an almost decade-old recommendation from Catherine Butler, which feels correct. It may be a minor item in Garner's catalogue, but minor Garner is still weirder than most alternatives. "Welcome to Beacon Lodge." This trespass brought to you by my absorbing backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Claude Rains)
I never expected to be able to see The Girl Who Couldn't Quite (1950).

For years I didn't even know that it could be seen without recourse to a time machine. Recounting its origins in Between Silk and Cyanide: A Codemaker's War, 1941–1945 (1998), Leo Marks was so more than ordinarily deprecating about the merits of his first stage effort that even a critical reader could be forgiven for taking his word that it was summarily consigned from its 1947 West End premiere to the ephemeral mercies of repertory and amateur dramatics. I've never heard of a production since I became aware of it. In fourteen years, I couldn't even get my hands on the script. Perhaps the memory hole of its fortunes allowed its author to feel comfortable giving away, as part of his briefing of Noor Inayat Khan, the gimmick of its plot:

'A girl who can't laugh . . . She hasn't laughed since she was five, and she's now eighteen. Her parents have taken her to every doctor, psychiatrist and comedian in the country but she still can't laugh. Then one day she looks out of the window and sees a dirty old tramp, and bursts out laughing. They bring him into the house and she finds him even funnier. They persuade him to stay, but the one thing he won't stand for is being laughed at.

'However, he's no ordinary tramp, and he's determined to find out what stopped her from laughing. And when he discovers what someone did to her she's cured. And that's when she sees him as he really is – a dirty old tramp. And he has to leave her.'

'It's very sad. And very funny. I suppose he leaves without letting her know how much she owes to him?'

What Sufi instinct told her that?

'He doesn't think she owes him anything.'

'Does it have a title?'

It hadn't until then. But her expression supplied it. 'It's called
The Girl Who Couldn't Quite!'

What Marks withholds from the reader with this poignantly personal scene of two writers meeting across a table of key-phrases and security checks is the other permanent record of his play—in 1948, after a longer professional half-life than its author would admit to, it was optioned and produced for the screen by John Argyle. I don't know its box office figures, but it got a favorable two stars on release from Picturegoer, played North America on network TV, by some digitally circuitous route found its way to the crackly free channel where I watched it like a shot. Whatever its infelicities of authorship or infidelities of adaptation, I regret to inform a codemaker almost a quarter-century dead that it's as recognizable as his work as if he'd encrypted it using "The Life That I Have." Secrets and damage, the patterns of people, being funny about things that aren't: that's the indicator group of a transmission from Leo Marks.

As promised, the core of the story is funny and sad and strange, a bittersweet psychoanalytic variation on ATU 559. Making her much braced against entrance, Elizabeth Henson's Ruth Taylor is a princess only in the sheltered upper-class sense, but her imperious caprices are straight out of fairy tale, she'd kill her suitors with riddles if she had them. Instead she treats her household with the inscrutable cruelty of a changeling, or perhaps only a deeply hurt child who has been treated for far too long as too fragile to punish or even remonstrate with in anything but the most placatory of tones. In the body of a grown girl, she holds herself as stiffly as a tantrum about to explode, her deep-set eyes as mad as a hawk's. "It isn't there," she announces, staring out over the manicured slope of the garden with its roses and terraced steps down to the fishpond. Asked what isn't, she answers with the same bitter finality, "Everything." After three minutes in her company, which is all she needs to bait and bruise her mother and grandmother and the two gentlemen who have for business and personal reasons come to call, it correctly startles the audience as much as her family to see her suddenly laughing, the disdainful stone of her face unselfconsciously alive. There's no malice in it, either, only a kind of quizzical discovery as encouraging to her mother as the sound itself. "Laugh? Is that what I did?" Hence the immediate mobilization to find the cause of her merriment, when nothing in thirteen years has cracked so much as a smile; fortunately she's made a sketch of it, the handsome stranger glimpsed on the grounds whom she describes to her mother as passionately as if she'd seen him in the movies, or a toyshop window. "He's the nicest face I've ever seen. Nicer than Mr. Pelham's. Nicer than Mr. Evans'. Nicer than anybody!" After such a distinguished build-up, what else could the laws of comedy and folklore produce but the jauntily road-worn and pugnaciously self-sufficient figure of Bill Owen's Tim, brashing through the well-bred anxieties of the drawing room like a beer cocktail in a battered hat, all sal volatile and short-stack swagger as he announces himself, "Now then, who wants me? And what's the bleeding game?"

The game, it will turn out, is a test of his own philosophy: "When I say charity, I don't mean, 'I've got a sixpence I don't want. You can have it.' I mean, 'I've got a sixpence I do want. You can still have it.'" On his introduction to the Taylor household, Tim dispensed airily with his last copper as a dig at the tight-fisted rich and made no apologies for his state, but he bristles with understandable dismay when the coin he's asked to part with is his dignity. In fact it's the sore spot in a generally irrepressible character, just the misapprehension of mockery enough to chase him from the house before Ruth's mother can even broach the bargain she hopes to strike for her daughter's health of mind. "There's two things in life I can't abide," he warns her when she catches him at the top of the garden, eye to eye only because he's standing two steps up: a torn pocket, a road-knotted neckerchief, his eyes warier than his blunt, brave words. "One's kippers and the other one's being laughed at . . . It makes me feel half my size. You can imagine how small that is." To Ruth, however, he possesses the stature of a hero, she hangs on his every word with an attention that disconcerts him as much as her mirth, this half-childish conundrum at once glacial and feral, breaking out in a rill of laughter one inappropriate minute, solemnly producing a sketch from the top of her stocking the next. Conscientiously, she stops herself from laughing when she sees its effect on Tim, the unprecedented consideration underlined by her direct confession, "I don't like a lot of people—not really like—not the way I like you." So he stays, wryly amused at his own responsibility, driving the bargain with Ruth herself. I remain the negative target audience for comedy spanking, but at least it is deployed exactly once to indicate the first time in her adolescent life that anyone has refused to indulge her whims and tempers, and critically as a consequence of the deliberate, show-offy rudeness she inflicted on her mother's guests in front of Tim. Much less in danger of playing like knock-off shrew-taming and much sweeter and twistier in light of the personalities involved is the relationship that evolves between them once he's taught her, by way of amends for the spanking, the refrain which is the only work-safe part of his filk of "Molly Malone." For Ruth, Tim is willing to take a spill down a hillside in good clothes, strike a classical attitude with a tea cozy and a fistful of biscuits, reel in the immemorial boot from an afternoon's fishing like any comedian, but the film takes equal and less slapstick note of just how much of their friendship is merely him treating her like a normal person, catching her up on the fundamentals of human manners and emotions and idiom as if it weren't at all strange for a somber, literal-minded eighteen-year-old to need an explanation of sharing like an eight-year-old or younger. He has a quirky, boyish look himself, those joker's brows visible from the cheap seats. In the admiring studies that Ruth draws of him until she can paper a portfolio with his face, he's downright sophisticated, a "smasher," but they don't make such an odd couple when they stroll down the streets of the village for real. It has overtones; others notice. Ruth's mother makes no comment, but the grandmother who has never approved of fostering an unregenerate vagabond makes sure to drop the bombshell where she can confront him with it: "Did you know Ruth is in love with him?" Of course she is, her wise fool, her imaginary prince. He's the talisman she carries against an encounter with fog, of which she has an unspeakable, childlike dread. But whatever Tim feels for her in turn—and it is more than obligation or pity, a shy, almost self-guarded flicker through his usual brass—it can't be as simple as ever after. The more obediently she follows his lead, the more seriously he takes his position as the person who is teaching her to be human, which inevitably, fatefully means the person who starts to wonder what stopped her the first time around.

I've let in the fog. )

The pothole in the path of auteur theory is that Leo Marks did not write the screen version of The Girl Who Couldn't Quite. He got credit for the source material of the stage play, but the screenplay itself is co-credited to Marjorie Deans and director Norman Lee and therefore I do not know who to blame for its problems. Its central relationship is weird and tender and carnivalesque and far more convincing than its tendency toward the whack-a-ding-Freud deserves and the film which contains it is jerky and mistimed and distracted with extraneous business and its principals don't meet until the end of an intrusively jokey, once again largely unnecessary first act. Some of its detours are not deadly, as when an introductory lesson in charity leads to a fête where Ruth has arranged to disburse quite a number of her household's goods without particularly warning her household first. "Oh, but anyone can give what's theirs! It's much more fun giving other people's." The sequence in which the respectable lawyer and doctor who orbit the Taylor household get fortuitously mistaken for a pair of escaped lunatics while dressed down as tramps, however, doesn't even compensate the audience with free rissoles. "Granny, they're better with salt!" Betty Stockfeld and Iris Hoey rhyme nicely as Pamela and Janet Taylor—the mother as slyly surprising an ally for Tim as the grandmother maintains a sniffy opposition—but Stuart Lindsell and Vernon Kelso as the aforementioned John Pelham and Paul Evans belong to some other comedy of manners entirely, one for starters in which it matters that John is courting Pam, who at least disposes quickly of the lead weight of the title drop. Ruth's damage is heavier than any other element of the plot and the only reason the film doesn't buckle underneath it is Owen and Henson meeting it head-on, unapologetically and without schmaltz even when the score by Ronald Binge is doing its best to the contrary. On the sliding scale of second features, it's a terrifically mixed bag and I want some idea of which divers hands mixed up what. The layer of adaptation makes me even more cautious than usual of looking for the author in the text, but Marks put himself so shallowly beneath the surface of Cloudburst (1951), I don't see how a viewer can be expected not to wonder how much of wisecracking, thin-skinned Tim is projected from the Marks without a brother who always got the joke in on himself before anyone else could. "Well, what kippers do is strictly personal." He was even more willing to talk about the breadcrumbs of himself he left in the traumatized, murderous voyeur of Mark Lewis, so perhaps he should be identified as well with fractured Ruth, the one who has to be puzzled out as well as the one who does the puzzling. "I don't like this kind of trust." Cryptography, psychology, storytelling, what he dealt in was pattern recognition and it makes it difficult not to approach his work as its own text for decryption. Since Tennyson's "Be near me when my light is low" recurs in Between Silk and Cyanide as both poem-code and prayer, I am inclined to assume against a total gut renovation on the part of the screenwriters when I encounter an emotionally significant reading of the same verses in The Girl Who Couldn't Quite. For all the details he kept to himself in his cagily charming memoirs and interviews, Freud always said the unconscious never lied and Leo Marks seems to have left quite a lot of his lying around onscreen.

As a recommendation, I am afraid the film plumbs new depths of uselessness in that I found it on the former TVTime, i.e. the Roku free channel which I really suspect of ripping off the catalogue of Talking Pictures, and it seems available legitimately in no other form beyond a Region 2 DVD which is currently out of print. BBC Genome claims that recorded excerpts of the original production were broadcast during its run in 1947 and I would naturally like to hear them, but no apparent dice. For such purposes must one hope that the Internet Archive has not actually nuked itself from orbit so that one day it can host a copy with decent resolution. The cinematography by Geoffrey Faithfull seems mostly matter-of-fact, but he had lensed the first couple of years of Michael Powell's quota quickies and the fog scene would be worth seeing without extra static. Just because Leo Marks had figured out how to blend gut-punches and comedy by the time of Between Silk and Cyanide doesn't mean he knew it first thing out of SOE, but in the fall of 2010, reading the brick-thick paperback on which I had pounced at sight that afternoon at the Ambleside Book Barn in Vancouver, I had no inkling of his awkward and signature screen debut and while I can see a lot in it that doesn't gel, I appreciate beyond words that it got filmed. It's not on the same level, but it's not an insult to the other inheritor of its title, the memory of Noor Inayat Khan: "But to me she was, and would always remain, the Girl Who Couldn't Quite." This sixpence brought to you by my smashing backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Otachi: Pacific Rim)
I mean it more in interest than in condemnation when I say that of the quota quickies directed by Michael Powell which have so far come my haphazard way, The Phantom Light (1935) is the first to feel like journeyman work. For coastwise thrills and chills, it gets a ten out of fog-blind ten. For everything else, I wish Emeric Pressburger could have been in on the script.

By his own admission in A Life In Movies: An Autobiography (1986), Powell did not fret unduly over the plot of his last assignment for Gaumont-British and if so, it shows. The set-up is sterling: called out on short notice from his native London to the remote coast of north Wales, veteran lightkeeper Sam Higgins (Gordon Harker) slings his kit bag off the train to discover his new post awash in rumors of suicides and false lights, wrecks led spectrally astray like the all-hands disaster that claimed the sister to the locally crewed Mary Fern. "It was the North Stack Light that drowned them all." Everyone from the chatty porter to the crabbed harbormaster has an ominous word to impart to him, replacing as he is the principal keeper vanished with one of his assistants à la Flannan Isles. Of the two locals tapped as relief, the craggy Claff Owen (Herbert Lomas) seems more superstitiously rattled with his somber brooding on the drowned, but even fresh-faced Bob Peters (Mickey Brantford) witnessed the wet marks of bare feet all through the lighthouse as if visited by a damp but duty-minded revenant. Just to ease the tension, all three men are sharing the close quarters of the rock station with Tom Evans (Reginald Tate), the stark-eyed survivor of the disappearance medically decreed unfit to be moved in his semi-sane state. The beyond last thing Sam needs as he settles in for a masterfully jittery night is the arrival of further complications from the mainland in the castaway persons of Alice Bright (Binnie Hale) who tried to wangle herself a berth in the lighthouse for purposes of psychical research and Jim Pearce (Ian Hunter) whom Sam clocked as a reporter the second the younger man flashed a wad of notes for more material reasons, but their slap-kiss bickering completes the full spook house of mysterious mischiefs, ulterior motives, and uncertain loyalties. Ashore, Sam fatefully waved off all warnings with the belligerent assurance of a man carefully not sounding the depth he may be out of: "It ain't going to spoil my sheet. I've been in the service now for twenty-five year come Michaelmas and I've never had me light go out yet." As the dirty weather thickens around the Mary Fern and the dirty tricks inside the North Stack Light, whether through the interference of wreckers, ghosts, or Bolsheviks, even the staunchest defender of Trinity House may have to admit that the odds of that record standing are off.

Unless you hate lighthouses, this picture should be foolproof. Especially since its treatment is more spookily adventurous light thriller than serious supernatural suspense, it should clip along with as much twinkle as shiver as the absurdity of its haul of red herrings ironizes the danger of a real conspiracy afoot at the light and after about half an hour it does, which would be less of an issue if the film ran more than 76 minutes tops. I like a slow burn as much as the next viewer and the dilatory opening almost sinks the story before it even gets to the harbor. The location shooting of the Ffestiniog Railway is fun as far as heritage trainspotting goes—especially if you don't mind that Tan-y-Bwlch is not a seaside stop—but the humor of the culture clash between Cockney cynicism and Welsh clannishness wears off faster than a Celtic twilight and while it may be fair to point to the preoccupation with outsiders and communities as a future Archers trademark, I feel I can guarantee that emigré Imre would have written a more nuanced take than jokes about everybody within earshot being named Owen. Sam does need to encounter enough local foreboding to justify the sympathetic greeting from Dr. Carey (Milton Rosmer), "I suppose they've been chilling your blood to begin with, eh?" along with the well-attested snafu of the phantom light, but the lighthouse itself is so atmospherically as well as structurally central to the film that until the cast is fully assembled inside its vertiginously stacked shadows and blaze, even the most charming visual anecdotes of witchy stationmistresses and musical fishermen can't help but feel like marking time. It feels a little, perhaps unfairly, as though the director got distracted by the documentary pleasure of hanging out in his own setting. Save it for Hirta or Chillingbourne, Micky. Fortunately, once the action stabilizes offshore, so does the tone of the film: its characters may crack wise about their scares, but they still jump. "Don't be silly. How could you vanish if you're invisible? If you're invisible, you vanish before you've started. Ridiculous." Or they don't seem fazed at all by the uncanny goings-on at the North Stack Light, which is part of what troubles Sam about Alice and Jim. She rattles off two or three explanations for her interest in the light, the rising melodrama levels finally prompting him to ask meaningfully if she last acted in East Lynne. It improves nothing when she turns a gam-flashing pair of short-shorts out of his Sunday trousers. "A ruddy girl in a respectable lighthouse!" For his part, the assumed reporter offers no explanations, only a coolly amused sense of biding his time that doesn't square with his unsettled situation or the nautical clumsiness that fetched him up to the stack, apologetically out of petrol, a straight man with a joke up his sleeve. "I'm going down to the storeroom to fetch my box of tricks." Stumbled on behind the curtain of his bunk, Tom Evans begs in apparent sound mind to be untied. Claff Owen, normally confined to the kind of poetic doomsaying on which folk horror thrives, serves an unexpected reality check with his quiet rebuke to his nervily bumptious superior: "You are always saying you are chief here, Sam Higgins. No one is disputing it." All throughout, a tetchy, sarky, worried little man with the tenaciously creased face of many a comic hero, Sam hangs on to his skepticism for his sanity and gradually edges out of archetype, ruefully shaking off a well-meant attempt at consolation with none of his usual bluster. "If a man's worth his salt, he ought to help it. And here's me with twenty-five years' service come Michaelmas, sitting here while a gang of wreckers plays tig in me own lamp room!"

Where the film shines, appropriately, is the lighthouse itself. Practically it may have been a composite of the Hartland Point Lighthouse, the Eddystone Light, and Islington Studios, but the salt-soaked art direction of Alex Vetchinsky, the dark lantern photography of Roy Kellino, and the dreamily logical editing of Derek Twist work it up into a world of its own, at once a kaleidoscopic maze of discontinuous stages as fragmented as the flash through a third-order Fresnel lens and a normally inhabited environment where oil lamps are still used to read by and sausages can be fried to a perfect split. We get our first sight of it not in establishing long shot, but from within the luminous glass hive of the lantern room, the camera revolving like an orrery within the tick of the mechanism that rotates its own brass-banded shadow across the words etched around the stone ring of the wall, Except the Lord build the house, they labour in vain that build it. Only after we have seen Claff and Bob about their duties, Tom restlessly tossing in his bunk, the human and optic workings of the light, do we refer back to the lighthouse as it appears to the approaching boats, a stark tunnel of stone self-illuminated against the night sky and sea in their webs of cloud and foam. Once inside, the camera will maintain a depth of field realistically commensurate with the tight curved fit of the tower—it does not affect the elegantly low-key set-ups—as its characters move, some easily, some gingerly, through its partitioned spiral of spaces, but it will return time and again to these icons of the light, the slow morse of its flare at a distance, the gear-train heartbeat of the lantern, the white strings of waves pouring over the ship-tearing rocks. When the light is put out, it's as sudden as a murder, the phantom light springing up on the cliffs like fool's fire while the faceted eye of the lighthouse remains hollowly dark. "God! It's out! My light's out!" Restoring it really feels like an elemental act, not only because of the ship in shattering danger out in the coal-thick fog. It's the steady sum of all its flickering, stubborn, foolish inhabitants, whose overlapping efforts are in defiance not just of the wreckers, quite modern ones, by the way, in it for the insurance fraud rather than the salvage, but of their own misgivings and mistakes. "Here, don't worry about him, miss. He won't be found drowned." No wonder the stops-out pyrotechnics are kept in reserve for the breath-catching wresting of the Mary Fern from the North Stack Rocks, an adrenaline shock of a montage cut as fast as pistons and timed to the blaze of the light, the churn of the screw, the desperate ringing of the telegraph full astern. Claff Owen put it most vividly, back when the film was just starting to get under way:

"Sometimes I think of the ships passing to and fro in the storm, and I listen to the gulls beating against the glass and breaking their little wings. It's then I realize the lives that are in my hands. Suppose I let that light go out? I'd have all those drowned souls on my conscience, beating their wings against my window like the birds."

And we're off to Mother Carey! It promises a ghostlier narrative than the one which actually unfolds, but underneath the credits a ragged figure, storm-lit, blank-eyed, dripping, emerges into the doorway of the lighthouse and with a strange fixed unstoppability begins to climb the stairs, exactly like the supposed return of the last chief keeper from the sea that drowned him. "Poor Jack Davies, back from the dead with the water streaming from his hair!" If the film had only been set rather than partly shot in Cornwall, I'd blame the Wild Magic.

Since Pressburger wouldn't leave Paris for London until the fall of 1935 and even then wouldn't be introduced to Powell until a fateful story conference in 1938, The Phantom Light was adapted by Ralph Smart, Joseph Jefferson Farjeon, and Austin Melford from Evadne Price and Joan Roy Byford's 1928 stage play The Haunted Light and while it winds up to a gripping and humane finale, it does kind of faff around getting there. Its quirkiness comes out in welcome details like a handshake instead of a kiss underneath the lighthouse's beam, but its assemblage from stock components sets a limit on its overall peculiarity. Its most consistently three-dimensional character is the North Stack Light. Powell himself had a disappointment in the picture: he had wanted Roger Livesey for the part of Jim. On the one hand, knowing the actor's magnetism and the tidal quality of his voice as showcased in I Know Where I'm Going! (1945), I can agree that Michael Balcon missed the boat. On the other, since I have liked—and associated with the sea—Ian Hunter ever since The Long Voyage Home (1940), I wouldn't swap him even without the equal-opportunity scenes of him stripping to the waist to swim for shore. I can rent the Livesey version from the hell of a good video store next door and imagine for good measure that Pressburger did work on it, in which case it would have been as thoroughly turned inside out and reinvented as their first collaboration. Over in this universe, it's a curate's egg of a quota quickie with a visible descendant in Robert Eggers; I got it with a slight crunch in the runtime from the Internet Archive, but it might look better on BFI Player if your location permits. "They think there's something romantic about lighthouses. Romantic!" Sam sighs with professional disillusion, making ready for an unexciting stay. Alas that his film was directed by a self-confessed sucker for lighthouses. This conscience brought to you by my chief backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Default)
To Kill a King (1980) is a compact riddle of half-hour television, a psychomachia of writer's block that plays like autobiographical ciphertext. Its muse is as elusive as radio astronomy and its spell breaks with a stone face thrown through a television set. Let it come as a surprise to no one that it was written by Alan Garner.

It's concentrated for Garner, actually, adhering to at least two out of three Aristotelian unities as it charts just about twenty-four hours in the stumped and haunted life of Harry (Anthony Bate), rattling so listlessly around the Tudor timbers of the Old Medicine House that he seems a less substantial presence within its pale-washed walls than the golden-tressed apparition first glimpsed like a candle at its window. The invitations to interviews and lectures which pile up in his mail and the glum recurring glance he gives his medal—Carnegie, Garner won it for The Owl Service in 1968—establish him as a writer of sufficient note to receive inquiries even from the States, but he hasn't written anything to feed their interest in years. He lights a fire as if he doesn't believe it'll warm him, clutches a composition book without daring to look inside. It's not hard to read a fisher king's desolation into this drouth of words. The wood into which he trudges to walk off one of his day-splintering "heads" looks sere as a green winter and so does self-neglected Harry, a dead-fall figure in his thistly slept-in cardigan and his barley-mow hair, unshaven as if smeared with ash. His vision is occluded with migraine and something worse: a trouble tuning in. The sky-meshed cradle of the Lovell Telescope tilts behind the prickle of trees to trawl for masers and pulsars and the vast cold spirals of the hydrogen line and Harry flounders awake in the night to transcribe the sudden clear whisper of a woman's voice. "I was asleep and it was already coming. I had to get it down. It came clean, fast as I could write . . . Years of nothing!" As dictated, it's a spellbinding incantation of stone and time and magic, but by the time it's read out over breakfast it's deteriorated into a scatological babble of joke rhymes. "But I didn't!" he protests, disbelieved: a shamed bear of a man bent over his treacherous words like a schoolboy called to account. "I didn't. It was something else." Only the drift-scan witness of the radio dish seems to believe him, cupped like the shell of the moon to his obstinate appeal: "You know. I did not." To his solicitous secretary David (Jonathan Elsom) and his skeptical sister Clare (Pauline Yates), it's just one more episode of lost marbles or silly buggers, to be accommodated with proprietary forbearance or dismissed with indulgent scorn over a lunch which descends from the bitchy to the bizarre as his sister's bland barbs clash as audibly as cutlery with his secretary's waspish deflections and Harry sits mute as a football between them, stirring only to answer his sister's matronly prod of "How's the head?" with the politely blank "Which one?" It is a real question, since we saw the other in the wet wood where Harry paced out the troubled paternity of his words against a ballad of Cheshire and Lancashire, a fist of black stone fished up from the water's iron glass. And if the child be mine . . . The pitted smile it showed him was older than churches. He threw it back with a shout as if it scalded him. A woman's voice sang him the rest of "Child Waters," a woman's shape eluded him across the water, the fields, the pierced mouth of the railway embankment, as if she were that Roland's tower of red gold shining on the other side of the Clyde. It's the question he doesn't want to meet as his afternoon makes a break for the nightmarish, the brittle malevolence of his visitors pursuing him through the uncannily autonomous involvements of telephone and manically swiveling typeball, coming around like a catch in the mind or a cry in the Selectric's chatter: "What are you going to do about it, Harry? What are you going to do about your heads?"

But I am. )

To Kill a King was the last episode transmitted of the BBC's Leap in the Dark (1973–80) and I would love to hear how biographically legible it was to viewers at the time, since I came to it aware of Toad Hall and Jodrell Bank and the bipolar disorder which Garner has discussed freely, to the point where as soon as I saw the broadcast date I knew that by the time it hit the airwaves, its author was in the grip of a two-year depression as bad as anything he gave his "shaggy, draggy, dirty Harry." Its efficacy as exorcism remains; I used it to break my own dry spell of critical writing, which has felt for months like missing a part of my head. I thought that close to the bone was the best place to start. Even without the personal element, the play would feel like unfiltered Garner just from its opening rush of a train past a telescope, an old song heard in an older house, the slippage and compression of all that sandstone time. The version on YouTube has suffered the normal erosion of unrestored TV, but I can't knock the irony of the VT clock at the beginning. "No, no barriers." This night brought to you by my four-cornered backers at Patreon.
sovay: (PJ Harvey: crow)
In case it is not enough to praise the picture for its ambiguously supernatural, female-forward wit and shiver, I have not seen a better argument for the collective authorship of the Lewton unit than The Falcon and the Co-eds (1943).

It was not produced by Val Lewton, nor did it involve most of his usual collaborators behind the scenes. Their catalogue is sufficiently extensive that merely through the interchangeable manufacture of the studio system one might reasonably expect a chip-in from DeWitt Bodeen, Jacques Tourneur, Mark Robson, Nicholas Musuraca, Robert De Grasse, John Lockert, Robert Wise, J.R. Whittredge, or Lyle Boyer, but nope. Like the majority of the popular B-series devised by RKO to capitalize on the success of their Saint films without having to cut a check to Leslie Charteris, The Falcon and the Co-eds was overseen by Maurice Geraghty and directed by William Clemens; it did have a one-off Lewton veteran in its DP J. Roy Hunt, but not in its cutter Theron Warth. Three of its stars had featured prominently in the quartet of shadowy, literate, enigmatically haunting titles that then comprised the CV of the Lewton unit—Cat People (1942), I Walked with a Zombie (1943), The Leopard Man (1943), and The Seventh Victim (1943)—but as contract players on the efficient factory floor of B-reliant RKO, Tom Conway, Jean Brooks, and Isabel Jewell were just as likely to be found on the set of another installment of the Falcon, especially Conway who had taken over the title role from his real-life brother George Sanders the previous year and would run with it for another three. It doesn't matter. The somberly thrilling sensation that this sunlit Gothic could at any second plunge off the California cliffs where its gentleman detective is suavely investigating a rumor of murder in the seaside hothouse of an all-girls school comes straight from the woman who wrote four screenplays for the Lewton unit—more than any other writer except Lewton himself—before her phosphorescent career was derailed first by the unit's dissolution in 1946 and then by her own blacklisting in 1948, the indispensable and still too often overlooked Ardel Wray.

Because Wray left so few traces on film outside of Lewton's productions, it would be chauvinistically easy to conclude that The Falcon and the Co-eds represents his auteurial imprint on her creativity, as opposed to the greater likelihood that it showcases the reasons her own interests and sensibilities meshed so fruitfully with the coalescing house style of the Lewton unit. With Conway's Falcon practically wading through ladies on his rounds of the Bluecliff Seminary for Girls, deftly pirouetting around student crushes and the submerged reefs of more adult passions which he navigates with the self-deprecating aplomb of quips like "Happens I have a phobia about being shot at," the film does not exceed the series brief of urbane light thrillers, but underneath the effervescence of amateur theatricals and midnight snacks and the sailor-suited trio of close-harmony troublemakers who gaggle after Tom Lawrence like self-appointed Bluecliff Irregulars, the doomier, dreamier atmosphere of the story soaks out of the slow-curling waves that crash at the foot of a smuggler's cove, the swirling glissandi of a concerto played like a residual haunting by the recording of a famous suicide. Loneliness is part of it, the alienation diagnosed by Tom as he surveys the sadly self-sufficient, book-muddled quarters of Alex Jamison, the poet-professor whom none of the girls can believe died of the natural causes on his death certificate:

"A man puts a good deal of himself into poetry . . . A man who perhaps demanded too much from people and had to live in books to get it. A quiet man who spent most of his time alone. A shy man who didn't try to assert himself, never thought of impressing people. Instead he probably took refuge in a world of his own imagination. How easily a man like that could have been dominated by others."

Everyone at Bluecliff seems to live in their separate imaginations, even the fussily no-nonsense dean concerned more with the effects of the scandal on the school's finances than with the possibility that a murder not only occurred on her campus but was uncannily foretold. Jewell's Mary Phoebus looks like a sleepwalker constantly startled awake behind the shield-glints of her glasses, her namesake-blonde curls and her breathless voice lending a china-doll air to her timid music teacher who seems curiously innocent of the implications of being caught rifling a dead colleague's desk when she explains it was only the manuscript of his poems she was trying to preserve. As if sheltered by the solidity of his own opinions, George Givot's Dr. Anatole Graelich with the dueling scar of his Mitteleuropean education on his brow holds psychologically forth like the sole practitioner of rationality on staff and freely confesses to testing the student body for telepathy with his pack of Zener cards. The clearest head for miles actually seems to belong to Brooks' Vicky Gaines, the wryly introduced drama teacher who feints and wrong-foots the Falcon as neatly as if she were lessoning him in stage combat, but even this unsentimental character has a habit of niching herself into the sea-cliff to lose herself in the ceaseless wind and the sea-swell, a kind of self-searching cosmicism: "I can't explain the sense of freedom it gives me. I watch the waves beating to the shore—I wonder if Nature's putting on a show just for me. To let me know how powerful she can be." Most obviously in danger of detaching herself from consensus reality is Rita Corday's Marguerita Serena, the darkly sensitive, allegedly clairvoyant student tormented by the conviction of following in the path of her father's insanity. "Beautifully, at times," she bitterly recalls him playing his own avant-garde compositions. "Other times strangely, wildly—" The moments when The Falcon and the Co-eds slips into her fragile subjectivity are some of its eeriest and most powerful, as when the shadow-treed soughing of the wind shapes itself into a deathly enticement to follow or, far worse for a drowned man's daughter, she hears clearly at last the spume-hoarse voice rasping itself out of the combers that burst salt-white on the rocks far below, Insane . . . only one answer . . . the sea . . . At the climax wherein the killer seeks to transfer her own unstable guilt into Marguerita, framing the girl as if by sympathetic magic to take the fall of the death by water in which madness ends, the film admits without forcing the scene's sapphic frisson. Nor can the accuracy of her premonitions really be explained by the murderer taking advantage of her morbid fantasies when she is seen absentmindedly doodling in order the symbols of the Zener cards which have yet to be dealt. The jokey blare of the ending propels the action on to the next picture with the usual tag of a damsel in flirtatiously accepted distress, but the elusive unease raised by its elemental setting, its frank talk of despair and suicide, even the casually piratical legends of the Devil's Ladder is not so easily left behind.

The Falcon and the Co-eds does not always blend glitchlessly into its series, compliance with which seems to account for Wray sharing her screenplay credit with established Falcon scribe Gerald Geraghty, although the original story was hers alone. A phone call apparently placed by a dead man is spookier than a student who faints at the drop of a foil is funny. Ruth Álvarez, Juanita Álvarez, and Nancy McCollum never feel over-egged as the precocious "Ughs" who rattle off their dialogue with tripartite enthusiasm and can swing a nursery rhyme like the Andrews Sisters, but Cliff Clark's Inspector Timothy Donovan and Edward Gargan's Detective Bates feel so out of place despite their standing as recurring characters that their most believable scenes are engulfed in an impassable whirlpool of schoolgirls or chased down the stairs by a bevy of indignant housemothers as if maenads are happening any second—accused of hiding behind their badges, they protest, "Lady, if we knew any place to hide, we'd be there!" The dorm party lit like a séance would fit right into the Lewton oeuvre, but the mercifully brief battle-of-the-sexes spanking would not. It is nonetheless functionally impossible to watch this picture without phantom consciousness of its Lewton unit version, backing off the hijinks and fully embracing the destabilizing poetry that edges it out onto the soft-spoken brink of horror even so. Conway in particular handles himself just fine as the droll and gentlemanly Falcon, but isn't it enticing to imagine him rolling up to Bluecliff in yet another inexplicable reprise of his Lewton-signature role of trash psychiatrist Dr. Judd, Satanist manqué and deserved recipient of one of the silver screen's best big cat maulings for trying to screw crazy sane? The effect on his professional fencing with Dr. Graelich would be suitably saturnine, especially in their discussion of the paranormal: "After all, psychic phenomena is an outpost in my profession and I don't have to tell you that Bluecliff has always been ultra-conservative." His inquisitive triangulation between the two female teachers would be shaded with as much audacious sleaze as apologetic courtliness, double-edging his compliment to Vicky, "It takes a very unusual woman to be rude and charming at the same time." His kindness to Marguerita might remain unaltered, much as one of his incarnations once treated an innocent abroad in the wildwood of the city with unexpected care. Nothing would change about Hunt's shadow-laced photography in which splashes of light are as unnerving as blood and the ocean surges and coils like a live thing in a dream. It feels unfair to Roy Webb who scored all eleven of Lewton's films for RKO that The Falcon and the Co-eds should employ him only as a highly recognizable, uncredited library clip.

I have no idea how Wray got from the Lewton unit to the Falcon series and back. It may not have been as much of a departure as it looks from this distance, when her seeming inseparability from Lewton is partly the survivorship bias of films that were actually produced—per Clive Dawson, RKO did announce her for other projects outside the unit that just fell through. It happened within the unit all the time: as much as I can find to admire in the somewhat mutilated Isle of the Dead (1945), I would give even more for their never-realized Carmilla. Their partnership continued beyond RKO, but she looked set to reestablish herself independently when he moved on to MGM while she was still under contract to Paramount. The project whose co-writing was still in the preliminary stages when her refusal to name names instantaneously ended her film career was the crime picture about postal inspectors which would eventually reach the screen as the much reassigned and rewritten Appointment with Danger (1950). It is as maddening as all the wasteful rest of McCarthyism: while I have no grounds for speculation on the particulars of an Ardel Wray-penned Dead Letter, I have no doubt that she would have thrived in the dark-drenched, dream-slant, nationally haunted environment of film noir. That she did not get the chance is a loss to more than my fantasies. Of the graduates of the Lewton unit, she is very much the one that got away.

To sum up, The Falcon and the Co-eds plays a great deal like its series detective took a wrong turn at the end of The Falcon in Danger (1943) and stumbled somewhere between the sugar fields of Saint Sebastian and the footlights of El Pueblo and while he may solve the crime, he leaves unplumbed this women's world where the key to two murders is a marriage and the sea speaks louder than a man. I got it from TCM and God bless the Internet Archive. None of its students are by definition co-eds, but the uncredited one with the glasses is the screen debut of Dorothy Malone. When Tom Lawrence casts the line of describing her favorite sea-view as lost and searching, Vicky leaves the bait dangling like philosophy: "Who isn't?" This show brought to you by my powerful backers at Patreon.
sovay: (Haruspex: Autumn War)
Yesterday in honor of the date, I watched Larry Yust's The Lottery (1969).

I can't remember when I first read Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" (1948). It wasn't for school; that was "After You, My Dear Alphonse" (1943). It might have been in one of the classroom anthologies I always read cover to cover no matter what we were actually assigned out of them—Hawthorne, Bradbury. The house being full of almost every genre of fiction but the realistic, I could equally have found it in The Lottery and Other Stories (1949), the same acid-browned paperback that furnished me with the dustily stomach-sinking despair of "The Daemon Lover" (1949), a story which upset me for reasons I would not be able to articulate for decades. Since the inhabitants of the unnamed village in which Jackson set her parable of the homey barbarities we take for granted so long as they don't come too close to home can no longer remember the origins of their annual rite nor even the particulars of its observance which have worn down over the centuries to a black box filled with slips of paper and the corner of a square piled with stones, it makes sense for the story to feel like something I have always known, as it feels I always knew about year-kings, scapegoats. I imagined it in New England even though the text only commits itself to the close-knit markers of rural America, thus occasioning that subset of the onslaught of letters following its publication which concerned themselves with identifying the location of the practice she had apparently, ethnographically described. I wasn't connecting it with witch trials or the Gothic literature of the region or even some vibe of Jackson's North Bennington, the white-spired college town where she would eventually spend the rest of her rather haunted life. The story merely felt as it was meant to: wherever you read it, like something that could happen here.

So much does the same seem true of the version commissioned by Encyclopædia Britannica as part of their Short-Story Showcase (1969–77) that perhaps in an effort to head off a similar outcry of letters from the parents of its student audience, it subtitles its opening wide shot of a well-trodden strip of ground between census-designated houses and the long awning of a shopping center through which a kid in a ketchup-red windbreaker is wandering, The following is fiction. Despite the occasional dramatically high or low angle on the assembled ring of the crowd and the hands and faces singled out within it, the 16 mm cinematography by Isidore Mankofsky looks most—hand-jostled, post-synched, slightly blown out in the blue haze of sun between summer showers—like a home movie, the amateur record of the year's lottery in eighteen minutes of real time. It tumbles among the boys scrapping for the best stones in the rain-drying field, eavesdrops on the girls who watch them as if from the other side of a school dance, the adults who close up shop for the morning, pull up in their trucks, drift over from household chores. "Steve hates to eat those TV dinners. I don't blame him." "I like Miss Spangler better than I did that second-grade teacher." "You ever hear of taxes going down?" "Then I'm going to finish it off with some lace around the sleeves." Once two men emerge across the parking lot, one carrying a black box and the other a wooden stool, the screenplay adapted by Yust will follow Jackson's dialogue almost word for word, but the writer-director's real fidelity to his source material is the plain ordinariness with which the events of June 27, 1969, since the cars and clothes of the film are distinctly contemporary, play out before the camera's unshocked eye. To the citizens of this tiny, blue-collar community gathering without coercion or secrecy, the routine of the lottery with its methodical double-checking of participants and narration of the rules and finally the finish in time to get back to the day's work is as familiar as the civic business of voting, as normal as May Day on Summerisle. The lots are folded slips of college-ruled paper, the fateful black spots rounded casually in with pencil. If the black-painted wooden box in which the lots are stirred and drawn is as old as its chips and scratches suggest, its padlock could and might well have been bought from the nearest hardware store last week. No one even dresses up for the ceremony—Olive Dunbar's Tessie Hutchinson runs up at the last minute explaining with a self-conscious laugh that she "clean forgot what day it was," while William Benedict's Joe Summers is sworn in as master of the lottery in the white shirt and khaki slacks in which the viewer can imagine him at a cookout or a lodge meeting. His white-haired boyish face and scratchy tenor give him both authority and informality as he assumes his office and begins the roll call: "Do you solemnly swear that you will perform without prejudice or favoritism those duties prescribed by custom and dictated by law?" The film does not ignore the tensions underlying the day; it catches solemn faces and nervous fingers, how tightly the little slips of paper are held or turned over and over like dice still falling. "Seems like only last week we got through with the last one," Blanche Bronte's Jean Delacroix murmurs to Irene Tedrow's Mrs. Graves, who answers with the voice of experience, "Time sure does go fast." Drawing for the first time for himself and his mother, Jack Watson—a still-teenaged Ed Begley Jr., barley-blond gawky in his worn-edged denim jacket—stumbles in his nervousness against the box and is not unsympathetically admonished, "Take your time, son!" He hurries back into place without looking at anyone, as if he's bobbled the job of being a man. But no one weeps, no one hides, children hang off their parents' arms with boredom and even adults mutter around the halfway mark of the alphabet, "I wish they'd hurry." Neither the performances nor the photography ever flip into more conventionally signaled horror than the measured and sudden denouement of Jackson's prose. The sky is clouding over as the boys' rough cairn of stones is reached for, but the ritual goes on rain or shine. Joe Summers has already tucked his pencil and the year's list of names back into his shirt pocket, professionally. "All right, folks. Let's finish quickly."

Attagirl, Tessie. )

It is not inconceivable that I could have encountered this film in its intended environment of middle or high school. I can remember different English classes screening To Kill a Mockingbird (1962), Shane (1953), Of Mice and Men (1992), Romeo and Juliet (1968), even a scene from what it took me almost a quarter of a century to determine had been A Tale of Two Cities (1958), since at the time I registered mostly that it did not contain Ronald Colman and was therefore inauthentic. I had no idea of its educational existence until this spring, when it handily turned up on the Internet Archive. It seemed appropriate to wait to watch it in season, which I can only hope does not contagiously throw the viewer's hat into the ring. Perhaps it doesn't need to. We don't live in a different country from Shirley Jackson, setting her ritual tacitly in her own home town. "It ain't the way it used to be. People ain't the way they used to be." I don't know, Old Man Warner. Stones, blood, corn, who's in and who's out, sometimes it feels like the cars and the clothes are the only things that change. Attagirl, Tessie, indeed. This duty brought to you by my prescribed backers at Patreon.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 23
456 7 8 910
11 12 131415 16 17
1819 20 21 22 23 24
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2025-05-25 21:29
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »