Entry tags:
All my life I've been expected to find the end and I've never been able to find it
On the one hand, I have read too much science fiction to be the ideal audience for "Man on a Mountaintop" (1961). Even before I get around to picking at the entanglement of gifted children and anti-intellectualism and human loneliness and abusive parenting that comprises this ambitious, unwieldy teleplay written by Robert Alan Aurthur and directed by Tom Donovan for The United States Steel Hour (1953–63), I want to fight it on its own ground of the literature that supplies the allusion of its title. Once a nationally famous child prodigy tenure-tracked before he could buy his own drinks, Horace Mann Borden (Cliff Robertson) at the age of thirty-one busses tables at an all-night cafeteria in Greenwich Village and doesn't crack a wince when baited to perform his savant's calculations for a fifty-cent contemptuous tip; he gets away as often as he can to the movies, returning to sleep in his rented room furnished with secondhand stills of old movie stars and the three books of his total library. He is obsessed with Philip Wylie's Gladiator (1930), seeing in the tragically misfit end of its artificially created superman his own doom since childhood. He meets no one who can challenge him to see himself instead in the super-intelligent community of Wilmar Shiras' Children of the Atom (1953). He calls himself a freak and a monster for graduating summa cum laude at twelve with an honor thesis in theoretical physics which he defended before the combined faculties of Harvard and MIT and despite reading voraciously enough to imprint on Wylie, never seems to have run across A. E. van Vogt's Slan (1946). Of course no one within the walls of the script will have handed him a stack of Zenna Henderson because the entire premise rests on how nihilistically isolated Borden has become from himself in the course of fleeing other people, but how could he not have known a single person in his formerly high-flying intellectual life who could have accurately informed him that he may be damaged, but he's not—for God's sake, especially in his field—that weird? His flat affect and avoidance of eye contact and jerkily uninflected voice may conventionally indicate the alienation of his intelligence or realistically reflect a childhood spent as a prop for his father's theories of pedagogy, an adulthood salt-smarting conscious of every discomfort his differences provoke. As much for his own reinforcement as to warn off the sympathy he can feel coming from his newest neighbor, he repeats, "A freak and a monster cannot live in this world of normal people." Corn-fresh from Iowa by way of an aborted summer in Europe, Gerta Blake (Salome Jens) is not equipped to argue with Borden's self-presentation of irredeemable strangeness; her ability to make her way into a friendship with him is founded on the determination of naïveté, her unconditionally offered support which she eventually names as love. She is a normal person, she wasn't reading by the age of four; her solution to the bitterness with which he describes himself as a machine because he understands the formula for mass–energy equivalence but not the meaning of the words I love you is to let him, like a fairy tale, kiss her. It is so far from a solution for a man directed by nature and nurture to look for the one correct answer to a problem that it winds him right up into a meltdown. It couldn't have to hurt to try him on Theodore Sturgeon first.
On the other, out of eviscerating nowhere at the midpoint of the episode comes the monologue in which Borden reveals the reason that six years ago he quit academia to haunt the local movie houses and duck his neighbors in the hall and make no use of the formidable intelligence for which he was so strictly valued:
"Yes, I was a teacher. At nineteen, I was an associate professor. And all that time, I had the feeling that everybody was looking and waiting, waiting, waiting. All right, prodigy, produce. All right, genius, produce. Produce the evidence that will prove Einstein is wrong. Produce the theory that will change the world. They were like children at my feet, waiting for me to hand them down the ABCs that would rock their very existence, but I couldn't do it. I couldn't do it. I could never do it, because I don't know enough and I'll never know enough. There's so much, so very much to know and I could never know enough . . . I used to walk the halls of that university, afraid to face people to whom I was becoming a failure. I hid behind the door in my office, hating the thought of seeing my students and the other members of the faculty to whom each day was another day of disappointment, another day in which I did not produce. And one day, I said, enough! I will live where are no mirrors, where I—where I won't even have to face myself. I will live alone, where I will disappoint no one. It's simple, satisfying, and I'm happy this way."
Oh, Borden. Wittgenstein at that age ran as far as the Russian front trying to drop out of his own head. It didn't work for him, either.
What right has this speech to ring true as pain when so much of the rest of the episode is full of stock sentiments about smart people in a stupid world? None of them are straw men, but most of its characters are fleshed out only as far as their arguments, their hostile or possessive or amiable misconstructions of Borden who holds the gravity of the play like a dark star in his separateness from them which may not be anything as mythical as he's built it up to be. His estranged father (Paul McGrath) is a sort of snake-oil cartoon of B. F. Skinner, an obscure psychologist who made his name exploiting his brilliant child as if its achievements were his own invention and still maintains with proprietary frustration that his new Einstein owes the world his gifts no matter the cost to himself. Bohemian Charlie Blake (Chris Wiggins) inclines toward a protective animosity when his little sister starts bringing their "real flip" of a reclusive neighbor home like a stray cat and only an insightful, unexpected comment on his avant-garde paintings checks him into a second look at this blunt dark-haired man in busboy's shirtsleeves, for once feeling safe enough to venture an opinion that might make him visible. Gerta is steadfast throughout, but the most telling show of support may actually come from Willie Bliss (Gene Saks), the brash off-Broadway actor who surprises everyone within earshot by apologizing to Borden for bullying him like the class clown with the bookworm, even if he has to broach the subject with typical theatricality: "Why, do I have to say why? Isn't it enough I want to apologize? I'm stupid . . . Sometimes when you're stupid, you're afraid of people who aren't." It does not please Gerta that they team up to entertain her party with a quiz kid act: she runs from the room in tears, leaving Borden mystified. The speech rings true because he does, even in ways I can't tell if his author intended. Even granting his definition of happiness as the avoidance of pain, the most encouraging thing that can be said for Borden when we meet him is that he has a stable routine. His reputation in the building is half creep, half punch line; the combination should make him disappointment-proof, but he shies off at the first threat of contact as if a civil word might unacceptably raise hopes. It isn't funny that he drops his newest armful of old Hollywood in his haste to get out of sight. His social overloads are brief and distressing, glitchier than his usual conversations with his throat working against the lockjaw of listener's expectations, the staccato key-clack of his sentences so invariable that hearing it lighten with uncertain pleasure at the end of a quiet evening strikes like a revelation. He can hold down a job on the night shift and lose himself in the silver screen. His diffident offer to Gerta of some pictures from his collection of William Holden is the bravest move he's made in years. It's a crystalline performance by Robertson, coming so soon after his first run at flowers and Algernon in The United States Steel Hour's "The Two Worlds of Charlie Gordon" (1961) that it is impossible for me not to wonder if he was typed slightly as an exponent of neuroatypicality, but Borden himself doesn't feel like a type. Genius is a tough act to put over and he does it without fanfare or equations, the seal on his intelligence not that it comes bundled with weirdness and trauma, but that devastating articulation of the flipside of Dunning–Kruger: the knowledge of how much he doesn't know. "Somewhere the cogs didn't mesh." It should not be lost on viewers sensitive to depictions of giftedness that the play, like Borden, ultimately blows off the big question of whether he will accept or decline the new offer of a teaching position at Columbia; it's irrelevant. It's not his route back to himself, or on to the self he was never allowed to be. "I'm a machine built without love," he tries to make real to the parent still bent on seeing him in terms of his potential, unwilling or unable to acknowledge that for all his eidetic memory and precocious mathematics the prodigy was a person instead of a paradigm shift in waiting. "Didn't you know that, Father? Didn't you know if you failed that I would be a freak? Didn't you know that? When you build a machine and it fails, you throw it away. What do you do with a man? What do you do with a man?"
I have less in common with Borden than makes a neat sign-off. I was reading by the age of four and designed my own octal system after reading about Maya numerals around the age of nine and was regularly challenged to recite verbatim passages from books that classmates refused to believe I was reading at my usual speed and would jerk out of my hands just to make sure, but I also had a talking doctor and the luck of a pair of parents who cared more about my resilience than my potential, which doesn't mean I can't understand a character who finds it easier to imagine their own death by lightning than a life that isn't seen as a disappointment. It gets me over the jostling rather than melding of themes in "Man on a Mountaintop" and helps a little with the construction of its female lead as a normalizing force of love. Borden is drawn with sufficient reality that even a healthier version of him would be hard to picture as particularly normal, except in the ways that it is completely normal to make only so much eye contact and watch a heck of a lot of movies and look in science fiction for ways to understand your life. When it gets into print, I'd give him Le Guin's "Nine Lives" (1968): Will he be different from me? Yes, that he will. There's the terrible thing: the strangeness of the stranger. However familiar some of the strangeness may be. Enjoy the preview of the Space Needle during the commercial breaks. This flip brought to you by my real backers at Patreon.
On the other, out of eviscerating nowhere at the midpoint of the episode comes the monologue in which Borden reveals the reason that six years ago he quit academia to haunt the local movie houses and duck his neighbors in the hall and make no use of the formidable intelligence for which he was so strictly valued:
"Yes, I was a teacher. At nineteen, I was an associate professor. And all that time, I had the feeling that everybody was looking and waiting, waiting, waiting. All right, prodigy, produce. All right, genius, produce. Produce the evidence that will prove Einstein is wrong. Produce the theory that will change the world. They were like children at my feet, waiting for me to hand them down the ABCs that would rock their very existence, but I couldn't do it. I couldn't do it. I could never do it, because I don't know enough and I'll never know enough. There's so much, so very much to know and I could never know enough . . . I used to walk the halls of that university, afraid to face people to whom I was becoming a failure. I hid behind the door in my office, hating the thought of seeing my students and the other members of the faculty to whom each day was another day of disappointment, another day in which I did not produce. And one day, I said, enough! I will live where are no mirrors, where I—where I won't even have to face myself. I will live alone, where I will disappoint no one. It's simple, satisfying, and I'm happy this way."
Oh, Borden. Wittgenstein at that age ran as far as the Russian front trying to drop out of his own head. It didn't work for him, either.
What right has this speech to ring true as pain when so much of the rest of the episode is full of stock sentiments about smart people in a stupid world? None of them are straw men, but most of its characters are fleshed out only as far as their arguments, their hostile or possessive or amiable misconstructions of Borden who holds the gravity of the play like a dark star in his separateness from them which may not be anything as mythical as he's built it up to be. His estranged father (Paul McGrath) is a sort of snake-oil cartoon of B. F. Skinner, an obscure psychologist who made his name exploiting his brilliant child as if its achievements were his own invention and still maintains with proprietary frustration that his new Einstein owes the world his gifts no matter the cost to himself. Bohemian Charlie Blake (Chris Wiggins) inclines toward a protective animosity when his little sister starts bringing their "real flip" of a reclusive neighbor home like a stray cat and only an insightful, unexpected comment on his avant-garde paintings checks him into a second look at this blunt dark-haired man in busboy's shirtsleeves, for once feeling safe enough to venture an opinion that might make him visible. Gerta is steadfast throughout, but the most telling show of support may actually come from Willie Bliss (Gene Saks), the brash off-Broadway actor who surprises everyone within earshot by apologizing to Borden for bullying him like the class clown with the bookworm, even if he has to broach the subject with typical theatricality: "Why, do I have to say why? Isn't it enough I want to apologize? I'm stupid . . . Sometimes when you're stupid, you're afraid of people who aren't." It does not please Gerta that they team up to entertain her party with a quiz kid act: she runs from the room in tears, leaving Borden mystified. The speech rings true because he does, even in ways I can't tell if his author intended. Even granting his definition of happiness as the avoidance of pain, the most encouraging thing that can be said for Borden when we meet him is that he has a stable routine. His reputation in the building is half creep, half punch line; the combination should make him disappointment-proof, but he shies off at the first threat of contact as if a civil word might unacceptably raise hopes. It isn't funny that he drops his newest armful of old Hollywood in his haste to get out of sight. His social overloads are brief and distressing, glitchier than his usual conversations with his throat working against the lockjaw of listener's expectations, the staccato key-clack of his sentences so invariable that hearing it lighten with uncertain pleasure at the end of a quiet evening strikes like a revelation. He can hold down a job on the night shift and lose himself in the silver screen. His diffident offer to Gerta of some pictures from his collection of William Holden is the bravest move he's made in years. It's a crystalline performance by Robertson, coming so soon after his first run at flowers and Algernon in The United States Steel Hour's "The Two Worlds of Charlie Gordon" (1961) that it is impossible for me not to wonder if he was typed slightly as an exponent of neuroatypicality, but Borden himself doesn't feel like a type. Genius is a tough act to put over and he does it without fanfare or equations, the seal on his intelligence not that it comes bundled with weirdness and trauma, but that devastating articulation of the flipside of Dunning–Kruger: the knowledge of how much he doesn't know. "Somewhere the cogs didn't mesh." It should not be lost on viewers sensitive to depictions of giftedness that the play, like Borden, ultimately blows off the big question of whether he will accept or decline the new offer of a teaching position at Columbia; it's irrelevant. It's not his route back to himself, or on to the self he was never allowed to be. "I'm a machine built without love," he tries to make real to the parent still bent on seeing him in terms of his potential, unwilling or unable to acknowledge that for all his eidetic memory and precocious mathematics the prodigy was a person instead of a paradigm shift in waiting. "Didn't you know that, Father? Didn't you know if you failed that I would be a freak? Didn't you know that? When you build a machine and it fails, you throw it away. What do you do with a man? What do you do with a man?"
I have less in common with Borden than makes a neat sign-off. I was reading by the age of four and designed my own octal system after reading about Maya numerals around the age of nine and was regularly challenged to recite verbatim passages from books that classmates refused to believe I was reading at my usual speed and would jerk out of my hands just to make sure, but I also had a talking doctor and the luck of a pair of parents who cared more about my resilience than my potential, which doesn't mean I can't understand a character who finds it easier to imagine their own death by lightning than a life that isn't seen as a disappointment. It gets me over the jostling rather than melding of themes in "Man on a Mountaintop" and helps a little with the construction of its female lead as a normalizing force of love. Borden is drawn with sufficient reality that even a healthier version of him would be hard to picture as particularly normal, except in the ways that it is completely normal to make only so much eye contact and watch a heck of a lot of movies and look in science fiction for ways to understand your life. When it gets into print, I'd give him Le Guin's "Nine Lives" (1968): Will he be different from me? Yes, that he will. There's the terrible thing: the strangeness of the stranger. However familiar some of the strangeness may be. Enjoy the preview of the Space Needle during the commercial breaks. This flip brought to you by my real backers at Patreon.
no subject
"Gladiator" sounds unhinged and its ideology seems kind of Ayn Rand-ish, but I want to give it a fair try sometime.
no subject
I can see Aurthur's teleplay as a rebuttal to Wylie, but Borden's identification with the novel feels exactly the way that people fasten onto books to me, especially if they hit them under the right/wrong circumstances. It gave him a template to make sense of his experiences, but not a model for surviving them. It reinforced how he felt about himself anyway. I like him a lot as a character.
"Gladiator" sounds unhinged and its ideology seems kind of Ayn Rand-ish, but I want to give it a fair try sometime.
I'd love to hear what you think. I have the weird rusty feeling that I may actually have read it—I recognized it as soon as the premise was described—but it must have been years ago and clearly did not make anywhere near the impression on me as it did on Borden.
no subject
That sounds remarkably like Liz in Questionable Content
https://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=4981 + 4982
An ex-colleague was at Oxford with Ruth Lawrence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Lawrence), when asked what she was like, he said something along the lines of "pretty normal, if you could get her away from her father".
no subject
Including the several-year panic attack! I don't think it's an uncommon phenomenon, if not always at so stark a scale. What happens to that character beyond the immediately succeeding pages?
An ex-colleague was at Oxford with Ruth Lawrence, when asked what she was like, he said something along the lines of "pretty normal, if you could get her away from her father".
And I can also see how you got here! I hope she's doing well. [edit] As of 2016, she sounds like she's chosen a life she likes. Her father sounds distressingly like Borden Sr.
no subject
It's tied in with the major storyline of Clare, lead character Marten's partner, being recruited to provide the research institute with at least one functional adult, and her reaction on finding out Liz is living in the rubbish-filled basement is to go and beat heads together and accept the job she was thinking of rejecting to ensure nothing like that ever happens again. The storyline has only progressed about a week past that, but Clare and Marten have quasi-adopted Liz to get her out of the basement. Unfortunately her major social talent turns out to be insulting people, so there's a definite socializing the feral child theme going on.
no subject
no subject
Yes! He certainly looks like a direct analogue. (I can't believe I've never heard of Vendergood.)
Borden doesn't have the problem of being an asshole to people. He can be rude, but it's not his default mode of interaction. Avoidance is more of his first line.
no subject
I don’t hate Big Bang Theory quite so much as a lot of self-proclaimed geeks, I’m mainly just indifferent to it; but this reminds me of one scene that did bother me—a character gets tipsy before giving an address at a physics conference, and consequently abandons his prepared speech in favour of doing fifteen minutes or so of science-themed standup comedy—to stony silence from the conference attendees. Even though his science jokes were pretty good.
I realize that Sitcom Law required his performance to go badly, but realistically, that audience would have been rolling in the aisles, and coming up afterwards to ask him if he was available to host the next year’s Ig Nobel Prizes.
no subject
Seriously!
(I am aware that the show generated a sweet poem about cats and otherwise I have never heard anything that made me want to see it.)
no subject
I’ll bet he didn’t even break into his colleagues’ lockers to demonstrate how poor the security procedures were!
no subject
As I read your write-up, I kept thinking, Robertson was born to play this role--and not just because of Charlie, but also his earlier role in Autumn Leaves, a film that suffers from Movie Psychiatry but is all the richer for his portrayal of a charming, traumatized man headed for a crack-up.
no subject
I'll see it.
[edit] I just discovered it's on Tubi this month, therefore while I cannot promise a review because I have a Hadean backlog including our marathon, I will at least mention when I've seen it, which will have to be within the next two weeks, because after that it's going away again.
no subject
no subject
no subject
The teleplay treats it as a milestone that Borden could read when he was three. I am being slightly sarcastic about the non-normality thereof. My personal experience is that my kindergarten was not prepared for me to be reading books; I was bored out of my mind, along with other problems. I was assessed at a college reading level in elementary school. I know people who took longer. I don't actually know when or with what complexity most children learn to read.
no subject
no subject
Thank you. I wasn't sure where to look for accurate information and my family is unhelpful as anecdata for multiple reasons.
(The confirmation that the standard ages of different grades has changed my childhood is useful, too: I was in first grade when I was five without skipping a grade. I had noticed that my niece is a solid year older in each grade than I was, but wasn't sure if it had to do with the timing of her birthday.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
The major problem I can see with Superman is that the last thing Borden needs is any further pressure to save people and/or the world. It should be enough just to be different, and loved, and exist.
no subject