When two souls collide this way, there's no compartment they can find a map in
I didn't realize until I was almost home that I had forgotten to take the paper bracelet off my wrist after my doctor's appointment earlier this afternoon. I was distracted by reading Emeric Pressburger: The Life and Death of a Screenwriter (1994), which continues to be excellent. Kevin Macdonald writes well about his grandfather, whom he knew only toward the end of his life; he admits the difficulty of recovering the truth of a person as notoriously private as Pressburger, who unlike his partner-in-film left neither autobiographies nor published diaries and apparently not that many letters or interviews, either, and does his best to track Pressburger's career from the estate his father managed outside Miskolc in Austria-Hungary to the cottage in Suffolk where he would regale his grandsons with stories from his life (but never the story of it). I'm learning all sorts of things about the interwar film industries of Germany, France, England. I don't always agree with Macdonald's assessments of movies or actors, but he's very good at context and history. The book is also a biography of exile, of alienness, of being an immigrant and a refugee. By the time he was my age, Pressburger had lived in six different countries—the first of which he didn't even choose to leave: it fell out from underneath him with the Trianon Treaty of 1920, when Hungarian Temesvár became Romanian Timișoara—and learned more than as many languages to varying degrees. He was sometimes homeless; he was often broke. He was officially stateless from 1926 to 1933. He had three and a half names over the course of his life and Macdonald uses them as an organizing scheme, dividing the phases of his grandfather's life by the countries or cultures he identified himself with, referring to him by chosen name in each. I have just reached the point in 1938 where he Anglicizes from Emmerich to Emeric, having previously Germanized to Emmerich from Imre in 1930 when he started working for Ufa. He's just been hired by Alexander Korda; The Spy in Black (1939) is right around the corner, which means I have all of the Archers to look forward to. I have already learned, however, that I made one great mistake about A Canterbury Tale (1944). I associated it preferentially with Michael Powell because Kent was his home ground. It's the most land-rooted of all the Archers' canon. It was Pressburger's film. He would say of it later that it was "the only one . . . that is entirely mine." Macdonald traveling through Romania in the early '90's in search of the places where his grandfather was born and spent his early life feels himself to be following Colpeper's instructions, walking the same roads as his ancestors in hopes of transcending the time between them. With one brief, difficult exception, Pressburger never returned to the land of his ancestors ("Home was Hungary occupied by Romania and what sort of home is that?"), though he kept his Hungarian accent to the end of his life and he always cooked its food; he rooted himself in England and even there he kept his continuity broken, not passing his story on. His grandson would have to do the archaeology decades later, restoring what fragments he could. But he wrote a film where nothing is really lost, where time gives back everything that it appeared to take away: it seems too simple to say it was wish-fulfillment. It was the thing worth fighting for.
Have a mix of links.
1. In the process of considering and rejecting the recent claim that the official history of the Manhattan Project deliberately misrepresented the science of the atomic bomb so as not to trigger public comparison to the chemical warfare of World War I, Alex Wellerstein says a lot of interesting things about publicity, security, professional bias, and the ways in which people think (or do not think) about information: "The Smyth Report: A chemical weapon coverup?"
2. Real-life noir, Californian and Vietnamese: "The Accidental Get Away Driver."
3. I am deeply disppointed there was not a functioning temple to Mesopotamian gods built in New York City last year. I really don't think it would have necessitated calling the Ghostbusters. The recreation of the arch from the destroyed Temple of Bel in Palmyra is neat, though, and I am sorry I did not see it.
4. There is one survivor of the Hindenburg disaster and one prosecutor of the Nuremburg trials still alive. This comic, too, is living memory.
5. Have a previously unpublished interview with Angela Carter!
6. I meant to link this poem weeks ago: Rodney Gomez, "Rally." What the hell, six things make a post.
Have a mix of links.
1. In the process of considering and rejecting the recent claim that the official history of the Manhattan Project deliberately misrepresented the science of the atomic bomb so as not to trigger public comparison to the chemical warfare of World War I, Alex Wellerstein says a lot of interesting things about publicity, security, professional bias, and the ways in which people think (or do not think) about information: "The Smyth Report: A chemical weapon coverup?"
2. Real-life noir, Californian and Vietnamese: "The Accidental Get Away Driver."
3. I am deeply disppointed there was not a functioning temple to Mesopotamian gods built in New York City last year. I really don't think it would have necessitated calling the Ghostbusters. The recreation of the arch from the destroyed Temple of Bel in Palmyra is neat, though, and I am sorry I did not see it.
4. There is one survivor of the Hindenburg disaster and one prosecutor of the Nuremburg trials still alive. This comic, too, is living memory.
5. Have a previously unpublished interview with Angela Carter!
6. I meant to link this poem weeks ago: Rodney Gomez, "Rally." What the hell, six things make a post.
no subject
no subject
Imagine being an uber driver and while giving some teen and his uncle a ride you end up getting pulled into a hostage situation/anti government rebellion forces
Han Solo did not sign up for this
> To be fair, in this metaphor, the uber driver is in trouble with the local mob boss because he was ferrying cocaine and dumped it out the window when it looked like he might get pulled over, so…
no subject
no subject
That is excellent.
By the way, what is Mark McKinney in recently that he showed up on your Tumblr?
no subject
no subject
Both of these also struck me. Nothing happened the way it does in the movies.
no subject
no subject
Rattle has rapidly become one of my favorite poetry magazines for publishing work like that.
no subject
Many thanks.
Nine
no subject
You're very welcome. (I am deeply enjoying Pressburger's biography.)
no subject
I keep meaning to ask whether you've read Pressburger's novel set in Franco's Spain- Killing a Mouse on Sunday? It's very good. It was filmed by Fred Zinneman- with some rather eccentric casting (Omar Sharif as a Catholic priest, Gregory Peck as an ageing bandit/Republican freedom fighter) under the title Behold a Pale Horse- which is also good but would probably have been even better with Powell directing.
no subject
I think the geography may have misled a lot of people, and perhaps the fact that autochthonous Colpeper looks like an analogue for Powell while there's no immediately obvious Pressburger stand-in like Theo in Blimp. Macdonald sees one in Sergeant Johnson, the American "occup[ying] a similar position in the story as Germans and emigrés normally do in Emeric's scripts. He is the detached and intelligent eye, bemused by the quirkiness of British life: mirrors that won't stay straight, phones with A buttons and B buttons, enormous beds, tiny streets, tea drinkers, driving on the left . . ." But everyone in that story is lost, everyone is adrift, even Colpeper who is right where he was born and is still all at sea. Everyone is in some way dispossessed. Everyone needs a blessing. Macdonald mentions early on that his grandfather had a rural upbringing:
"Imre grew up on the estate [managed by his father], with an intimate knowledge of the finer points of geese rearing, feeding and slaughtering cows and pigs, growing wheat and seasoning timber. His writing was forever peppered with figures of speech drawn from country pursuits: he thought he and his partner, Michael Powell, were suited to each other 'like two dray horses', and compared a writer who loses his language to a 'carpenter who loses his tools'. Throughout his life he harked back to his idyllic rural childhood, and was forever aware of the continuity and values of rustic life."
That—specifically "continuity"—makes me look differently at Colpeper.
How interesting that it turns out to have been Pressburger's. This might explain why Powell was dissatisfied with it.
Macdonald writes:
"Michael, brought up in the shadow of the cathedral and the surrounding countryside, was understandably enthusiastic. But as he later admitted, A Canterbury Tale was much less of a personal film for him than he had expected. He always said that it was the film which was most fully Emeric of all those they did together. Emeric went even further saying: 'This is the only one of them that is entirely mine.'
[. . .] Michael blamed himself for the film's failure: 'It was one of Emeric's most complicated ideas and I really let him down for not insisting that it was simplified.' Oddly, A Canterbury Tale is now recognized as one of The Archers' finest, if most eccentric, achievements. Over the years the dormant power of the film came alive. 'When the critics got at it in 1944,' said Emeric almost forty years later, 'I always thought that all we had wanted to do had not come off. But it had. I know now it had. I now love the slender storyline which doesn't seem to lead anywere, except perhaps to an old caravan, but in fact leads to the majesty of Canterbury Cathedral.' When Emeric was asked to retrospectives of his work in later years, A Canterbury Tale was the one film which he always agreed to introduce, as he did at the Museum of Modern Art in New York in 1980:
'We have made some good films, some less good films and one or two very good films. I think that a film should have a clear story and it should have, if possible, something which is probably the most difficult thing in film-making: it should have a little bit of magic . . . Now this is why A Canterbury Tale is one of our favourite films, because in this film we have somehow managed to coax out a little bit of magic. Magic being untouchable and very difficult to cast, you can't deal with it at all. You can only try to prepare some little cosy nests, hoping that a little bit of magic will slide into it somehow. Well, this is so in A Canterbury Tale.'"
I keep meaning to ask whether you've read Pressburger's novel set in Franco's Spain- Killing a Mouse on Sunday? It's very good.
I have not! I saw yesterday that his second novel The Glass Pearls (1966) has come back into print, but I have not yet read either of them.
It was filmed by Fred Zinneman- with some rather eccentric casting (Omar Sharif as a Catholic priest, Gregory Peck as an ageing bandit/Republican freedom fighter) under the title Behold a Pale Horse- which is also good but would probably have been even better with Powell directing.
I've run into mention of it, but also not seen it. I will make an effort to track it down.