Und was bekam des Soldaten Weib aus dem weiten Russenland?
Yesterday I helped
fleurdelis28 move stuff between her various apartments. In return, she played me the 1960 D'Oyly Carte Iolanthe, so that you should now expect a post about the Lord Chancellor sometime in the next day or so. That was awesome. I also stayed up to watch the Oscars, which was somewhat less awesome (trans: WTF NO PETER O'TOOLE), not to mention I remembered only some time after the ceremonies had ended that I'd planned to get up early this morning in order to tape 49th Parallel (1941) on TCM. I slept three hours. I got up anyway.
49th Parallel is a strange, strange film. Made in 1940, before Powell and Pressburger amalgamated into the Archers, it's clearly recognizable as a propaganda piece—on the other hand, it's a propaganda piece whose lead characters are six Nazis, the only survivors of a U-boat sunk in Hudson Bay, on the run toward the border of the then-neutral United States. The story progresses across Canada in set-pieces, a trading post, a religious community, a tourist attraction, an academic's camp, as one after another the Nazis are picked off, captured or killed. And then there were none. Did I mention Ralph Vaughan Williams did the music?
I can only imagine the rules that 49th Parallel broke in its choice of protagonists, although I will admit I wouldn't have expected anything less from the men who would later create The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp. Eric Portman is Leutnant Ernst Hirth, the kind of blindly brittle idealist, as self-righteous as he is inexperienced, who would have been fragged by his own men in Vietnam; demonstrably neither unintelligent nor unresourceful, he is nonetheless so locked into his own ideologies that watching him interact outside his accustomed hierarchy is painful. It's mentioned once that he was a latecomer to the Nazi Party in 1936, as opposed to his commander who was there from the beginning in 1930, and indeed he has all the desperate fervency of a convert—the others can pass for ordinary Canadian citizens, but Hirth must present himself as the perfect Aryan superman, and it's really this inability to keep his head down and his mouth shut that dooms the party in the end. But there's humanity in that, and therefore the character is chilling where he might otherwise have been cardboard. He's dangerous not because he's some cold, inhuman machine, but because he's a bright, efficient, arrogant man who believes.* Likewise one of the crewmen, Vogel (Niall MacGinnis), who was a baker before the war and would much rather be punching dough than shooting civilians and tearing down pictures of the Queen; he folds a rosary under a dead man's hands and sees a girl safe home against orders, and his resigned obedience to Nazism is perhaps more disturbing than Hirth's dogmatic bluster, because Vogel at least knows there are other ways to live. "What can you do? When you're a boy, you like playing soldiers. When you're a young man, you can't get work unless you belong to them." These are neither comic cartoons nor monsters, and their position as viewpoint characters, hunted, outnumbered, moreover forces us to identify with them, no matter how many deaths are on their hands.
As for the rest of the cast, Laurence Olivier as the Québécois trapper Johnnie devours the scenery alive and spits out the splinters; his boisterous hamming it up might have come in under the wire as a character who lives with the volume turned up to eleven, but his accent so reminded me of Inspector Clouseau that I found it almost impossible to take him seriously. Leslie Howard fares rather better as Philip Armstrong Scott, a cheerfully comfortable anthropologist who takes art treasures along for company in the Rockies and checks himself curiously for physical indicators of fear as he's being tied up, even if he gets a little two-fisted toward the end. Raymond Massey plays a positive character for once as Andy Brock, a deserter-by-default who has overstayed his leave by eight days, fed up with guarding the Chippewa Canal—"Who'd want to steal it, anyway?"—when he hoped to be posted overseas. And Anton Walbrook continues to be impressive as the leader of a community of Hutterites whom the Nazis stumble across and mistake for like-minded émigrés: he is not flashy, and his speech has none of the fiery rhetoric with which Hirth invokes the new order of Nazism and the ancient loyalty which all blood Germans owe to their Führer and themselves, but he's quietly, reliably convincing as a man who has no interest in race or country or appeals to nationalism, only in what people do with their lives; and of what people like Hirth are doing, he doesn't approve.
The film is episodic, and this is not in its favor. The constant zigzagging across the provinces feels weirdly like a wartime travelogue, and the major encounters start to resemble Socratic dialogues as time and time again Nazi propaganda runs up against obstinate Canadian decency, but some of the smaller scenes are great. There's one beautiful, paranoid sequence during Indian Day in Banff that might have been scripted by Hitchcock, as a Mountie interrupts the festivities to read out a compiled police description of the three Nazis who are at that moment attempting to camouflage themselves in the crowd. "Look closely at your neighbors . . ." As each detail is broadcast, the camera tightens in on the faces of the three men, one of whom, perhaps even the wire-taut Hirth, will break not from the scrutiny but from the suspense, and it's a brilliantly perverse pull of sympathy for the Nazis. Another scene has them in Winnipeg after days of tramping the roads, penniless, staring miserably through restaurant windows at all the food they haven't been eating and can't afford, until one of the younger crewmen has the bright idea of selling Hirth's field glasses to buy hot dogs: but he's been in such a boil of suppressed fury that neither they nor the audience can tell whether he's going to lose it right there in the automat (thereby blowing their cover) until he bites into the hot dog, awards one of his rare smiles, and asks how much they got for the binoculars. And the seaplane crash is a nail-biter—the pilot has not logged so many hours' flight time; Hirth, true control freak that he is, won't stop being a back seat driver; and there are trees coming up fast.
So I wouldn't call 49th Parallel one of the masterpieces of the Archers' career, although I see that it won Emeric Pressburger an Oscar for Best Original Story in 1943 and nominations that same year for Best Picture and Best Screenplay. It's more of a conventional war movie than anything else I've seen from them, and yet it doesn't quite fit into any of its conventions, which may account for the disjointed feel: it has too many elbows, or eyebrows, or something. (It has Laurence Olivier's accent.) But I'm glad to have seen the movie, and now I can wait to compare it with One of Our Aircraft Is Missing (1942). But first I should do laundry.
*He exists on the same character spectrum as M*A*S*H's Frank Burns, I realized—the fanatical subordinate that every superior officer dreads, the one who not only knows all the rules and regulations better than you, he actually believes the stuff. But as the archetypal martinet, Major Burns was played almost exclusively for laughs, and there's nothing funny about Leutnant Hirth. He's not incompetent. He's not a coward. Yes, the finale delivers him the comeuppance that a wartime audience must have waited to see, but he comes within a checklist's breadth of success. This is not the kind of propaganda film meant to leave you reassured that good old British (or Canadian) spirit will carry the day. You don't get to sit back and relax. Instead we have met the enemy and, you know, they are kind of scary.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
49th Parallel is a strange, strange film. Made in 1940, before Powell and Pressburger amalgamated into the Archers, it's clearly recognizable as a propaganda piece—on the other hand, it's a propaganda piece whose lead characters are six Nazis, the only survivors of a U-boat sunk in Hudson Bay, on the run toward the border of the then-neutral United States. The story progresses across Canada in set-pieces, a trading post, a religious community, a tourist attraction, an academic's camp, as one after another the Nazis are picked off, captured or killed. And then there were none. Did I mention Ralph Vaughan Williams did the music?
I can only imagine the rules that 49th Parallel broke in its choice of protagonists, although I will admit I wouldn't have expected anything less from the men who would later create The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp. Eric Portman is Leutnant Ernst Hirth, the kind of blindly brittle idealist, as self-righteous as he is inexperienced, who would have been fragged by his own men in Vietnam; demonstrably neither unintelligent nor unresourceful, he is nonetheless so locked into his own ideologies that watching him interact outside his accustomed hierarchy is painful. It's mentioned once that he was a latecomer to the Nazi Party in 1936, as opposed to his commander who was there from the beginning in 1930, and indeed he has all the desperate fervency of a convert—the others can pass for ordinary Canadian citizens, but Hirth must present himself as the perfect Aryan superman, and it's really this inability to keep his head down and his mouth shut that dooms the party in the end. But there's humanity in that, and therefore the character is chilling where he might otherwise have been cardboard. He's dangerous not because he's some cold, inhuman machine, but because he's a bright, efficient, arrogant man who believes.* Likewise one of the crewmen, Vogel (Niall MacGinnis), who was a baker before the war and would much rather be punching dough than shooting civilians and tearing down pictures of the Queen; he folds a rosary under a dead man's hands and sees a girl safe home against orders, and his resigned obedience to Nazism is perhaps more disturbing than Hirth's dogmatic bluster, because Vogel at least knows there are other ways to live. "What can you do? When you're a boy, you like playing soldiers. When you're a young man, you can't get work unless you belong to them." These are neither comic cartoons nor monsters, and their position as viewpoint characters, hunted, outnumbered, moreover forces us to identify with them, no matter how many deaths are on their hands.
As for the rest of the cast, Laurence Olivier as the Québécois trapper Johnnie devours the scenery alive and spits out the splinters; his boisterous hamming it up might have come in under the wire as a character who lives with the volume turned up to eleven, but his accent so reminded me of Inspector Clouseau that I found it almost impossible to take him seriously. Leslie Howard fares rather better as Philip Armstrong Scott, a cheerfully comfortable anthropologist who takes art treasures along for company in the Rockies and checks himself curiously for physical indicators of fear as he's being tied up, even if he gets a little two-fisted toward the end. Raymond Massey plays a positive character for once as Andy Brock, a deserter-by-default who has overstayed his leave by eight days, fed up with guarding the Chippewa Canal—"Who'd want to steal it, anyway?"—when he hoped to be posted overseas. And Anton Walbrook continues to be impressive as the leader of a community of Hutterites whom the Nazis stumble across and mistake for like-minded émigrés: he is not flashy, and his speech has none of the fiery rhetoric with which Hirth invokes the new order of Nazism and the ancient loyalty which all blood Germans owe to their Führer and themselves, but he's quietly, reliably convincing as a man who has no interest in race or country or appeals to nationalism, only in what people do with their lives; and of what people like Hirth are doing, he doesn't approve.
The film is episodic, and this is not in its favor. The constant zigzagging across the provinces feels weirdly like a wartime travelogue, and the major encounters start to resemble Socratic dialogues as time and time again Nazi propaganda runs up against obstinate Canadian decency, but some of the smaller scenes are great. There's one beautiful, paranoid sequence during Indian Day in Banff that might have been scripted by Hitchcock, as a Mountie interrupts the festivities to read out a compiled police description of the three Nazis who are at that moment attempting to camouflage themselves in the crowd. "Look closely at your neighbors . . ." As each detail is broadcast, the camera tightens in on the faces of the three men, one of whom, perhaps even the wire-taut Hirth, will break not from the scrutiny but from the suspense, and it's a brilliantly perverse pull of sympathy for the Nazis. Another scene has them in Winnipeg after days of tramping the roads, penniless, staring miserably through restaurant windows at all the food they haven't been eating and can't afford, until one of the younger crewmen has the bright idea of selling Hirth's field glasses to buy hot dogs: but he's been in such a boil of suppressed fury that neither they nor the audience can tell whether he's going to lose it right there in the automat (thereby blowing their cover) until he bites into the hot dog, awards one of his rare smiles, and asks how much they got for the binoculars. And the seaplane crash is a nail-biter—the pilot has not logged so many hours' flight time; Hirth, true control freak that he is, won't stop being a back seat driver; and there are trees coming up fast.
So I wouldn't call 49th Parallel one of the masterpieces of the Archers' career, although I see that it won Emeric Pressburger an Oscar for Best Original Story in 1943 and nominations that same year for Best Picture and Best Screenplay. It's more of a conventional war movie than anything else I've seen from them, and yet it doesn't quite fit into any of its conventions, which may account for the disjointed feel: it has too many elbows, or eyebrows, or something. (It has Laurence Olivier's accent.) But I'm glad to have seen the movie, and now I can wait to compare it with One of Our Aircraft Is Missing (1942). But first I should do laundry.
*He exists on the same character spectrum as M*A*S*H's Frank Burns, I realized—the fanatical subordinate that every superior officer dreads, the one who not only knows all the rules and regulations better than you, he actually believes the stuff. But as the archetypal martinet, Major Burns was played almost exclusively for laughs, and there's nothing funny about Leutnant Hirth. He's not incompetent. He's not a coward. Yes, the finale delivers him the comeuppance that a wartime audience must have waited to see, but he comes within a checklist's breadth of success. This is not the kind of propaganda film meant to leave you reassured that good old British (or Canadian) spirit will carry the day. You don't get to sit back and relax. Instead we have met the enemy and, you know, they are kind of scary.
no subject
no subject
I felt like such a moron for missing The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp—since my family has a working VCR, it would have been far simpler for me to remember to put in the tape rather than have to locate a DVD if I want my parents to see it, which is currently the case.
though I still want to rent the upcoming Criterion release (out I think next week)
It came out last week and I would be more than happy to rent it. I'm curious about the short The Volunteer (1943) that accompanies the film.
no subject
no subject
No, he was present. I simply would have liked to see him—finally—win an Oscar.
no subject
no subject
I first heard of Venus months ago when it was still only in film festivals, and instantly thought, "Peter O'Toole!" and since then I haven't had the chance to see it in theaters. I should do this soon before it disappears.
(a flimsy excuse but still. my love for Peter Finch shall not be denied)
I think I've only seen him in The Flight of the Phoenix (1965) . . .
no subject
I first saw him in Kidnapped when I was quite young, and he was swashbuckling and jovial and friendly yet dangerous that I instantly adored him. *g* I've great affection for that film in general. he's also in The Nun's Story with Audrey Hepburn, which I enjoyed seeing.
no subject
no subject
Did you see Venus? What I heard was that it was an okay movie in which he was very good, which seemed fair enough to me; but I can't speak from personal viewing.
no subject
So much of the talk beforehand seemed to be "Surely this time...", quite unrelated to the actual film.
no subject
I saw Becket last night at the Kendall Square Cinema, where it's playing for a limited time; I hadn't seen it since high school, and never on a big screen. As fond as I am of Rex Harrison's Henry Higgins, I fail to understand why neither Peter O'Toole nor Richard Burton—or the both of them together—took home an Oscar for that film.
no subject
Popping in a mere ten years late to suggest that Hollywood may have found the film a bit too queer.
no subject
Their chemistry alone deserved its own category!
no subject
no subject
Yeah: I should see that . . .
no subject
Venus is not an award-winning movie on any count, including O'Toole's performance. Though he didn't win an Oscar for the a performance that merited it, I'm relieved he didn't get one for a performance that didn't.
If you go to West Newton to watch Venus, they may still be preceding it with the trailer for Becket.
no subject
See reply to
no subject
In the Colonel Blimp commentary, during Anton Walbrook's great speech at the immigration office, Michael Powell said, "Imagine all this being said on the screen in the middle of a great war with Germany. You can't blame Churchill, really," and he laughed. In the Black Narcissus commentary, he mentions that the Catholic Church probably had a right to be offended by that latter film. It seems that from the comfort of the 1980s, he was ready to admit that he and Pressburger were being a little naughty.
Eric Portman is Leutnant Ernst Hirth,
He was good, and his face suited the role well. He also looked a little like Ralph Fiennes, I thought.
These are neither comic cartoons nor monsters, and their position as viewpoint characters, hunted, outnumbered, moreover forces us to identify with them, no matter how many deaths are on their hands.
Yes--that was brilliant and daring. It sort of reminded me of how you're forced to identify with Norman Bates in Psycho after he's killed Marion.
his boisterous hamming it up might have come in under the wire as a character who lives with the volume turned up to eleven, but his accent so reminded me of Inspector Clouseau that I found it almost impossible to take him seriously.
Yousa bombad critic movie again! Great success!
I kind of think it's a shame Laurence Olivier never got the chance to play Luigi from Super Mario Brothers.
Raymond Massey plays a positive character for once as Andy Brock,
Sonya--I'm not askin' for those pants. I'm just takin' 'em!
There are a lot of ways to read that scene, I think.
the major encounters start to resemble Socratic dialogues as time and time again Nazi propaganda runs up against obstinate Canadian decency,
Yeah. And it was awfully convenient how aspects of the Native American tribe Leslie Howard was studying happened to exactly reference things the Nazis had done earlier in the film.
no subject
Yes. He has an odd, modeled, slightly asymmetrical face, and from so many angles he looks as though there's something he's not saying. And if this was the role an audience familiar with Powell and Pressburger knew him for—probably because of Iolanthe, I've been thinking a lot recently about stock characters and recurring casts and the metatheatrical effects thereof—I can only imagine it affected their initial reactions to Colpeper, who might have been less chilly and dubious if played, as originally cast, by Roger Livesey.
He also looked a little like Ralph Fiennes, I thought.
Hm. I've only seen Ralph Fiennes in Schindler's List and The Constant Gardener (although Oscar and Lucinda has been on my to-see list for years) and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, in which he was not exactly recognizable.
Yes--that was brilliant and daring. It sort of reminded me of how you're forced to identify with Norman Bates in Psycho after he's killed Marion.
(I haven't seen Psycho. But I think I was spoiled for it as soon as I knew what it was . . .) I'm curious for what other films this is true. The ones that come immediately to mind are M and The Collector (1965), which are also stories of serial killers, and then Peeping Tom, which I have yet to see. Is it more appropriate to portray murderers as human than Nazis?
I kind of think it's a shame Laurence Olivier never got the chance to play Luigi from Super Mario Brothers.
Or Pepé Le Pew.
There are a lot of ways to read that scene, I think.
Says the man who slashed A Canterbury Tale . . .
Because so much of 49th Parallel is unconventional propaganda, I suspect the film would have worked better for me in some ways without the two-fisted heroics—they're in character for Raymond Massey's Brock, who joined up specifically to stomp some Nazi ass, but I'm perfectly willing to accept art and academia as causes worth fighting for without Leslie Howard's fisticuffs to hammer home the point. I suppose his character could be meant to represent all the people who disapprove from a distance until it affects them personally, but I think it's just as significant that even in wartime, research is still getting done and the paintings of Picasso are still beautiful and Thomas Mann, no matter how many copies of his books were burned in Berlin, is still receiving the appreciation he deserves.
And it was awfully convenient how aspects of the Native American tribe Leslie Howard was studying happened to exactly reference things the Nazis had done earlier in the film.
Yeah, and don't ask how the Blackfoot felt about that . . .
no subject
I hadn't heard about that. It certainly would be quite a bit different--the whole movie would've seemed different.
I haven't seen Psycho.
It's very worth watching.
Is it more appropriate to portray murderers as human than Nazis?
I don't think so. Though for propaganda purposes, I suppose it would have been more important to dehumanise Nazis.
I can't think of many examples of Nazis portrayed as human. There's The Night Porter (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Night_Porter), which I haven't seen, though I very much want to.
Says the man who slashed A Canterbury Tale . . .
Heh. I found it too easy to have pornographic thoughts about young Sheila Sim.
I'm perfectly willing to accept art and academia as causes worth fighting for without Leslie Howard's fisticuffs to hammer home the point.
Me too. Though I sort of liked how Howard let the Nazi unload his gun at him--it kind of reminded me of the climactic scene in Akira Kurosawa's Stray Dog (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stray_Dog_%28film%29), where it was done a bit better.
research is still getting done and the paintings of Picasso are still beautiful
I actually became really upset when the paintings and books were destroyed--maybe it just reminded me of all the books and art Nazis, and forces like the Nazis, have destroyed through the years.
Then I looked at The New York Times first thing to-day and saw two Picassos were just stolen (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20070228/france-picasso-theft). Is it just me, or has there been a bizarre increase in mishandled great paintings lately?
no subject
I mentioned it about a month ago, when I discovered the Powell and Pressburger Appreciation Society. As much as I like Roger Livesey, I genuinely can't imagine him in the role; I know actors can play successfully against type, but I'm not sure his Colpeper would have had that same initial, glacial charge.
I don't think so.
Maybe I should have used the word "acceptable"? I just remember there seemed to be a whole slew of films where if you needed a villain, hello, Nazis! They were like cinematic shorthand for pure evil, so you didn't need to worry about the ethical implications of blowing them up, or something.
Though for propaganda purposes, I suppose it would have been more important to dehumanise Nazis.
I know. But they're so much scarier when human . . .
There's The Night Porter, which I haven't seen, though I very much want to.
Same. I saw the Criterion DVD in a store last year and, from the cover image alone, wanted to know the story.
Heh. I found it too easy to have pornographic thoughts about young Sheila Sim.
She is beautiful. And she was in surprisingly few films, for her talent: I couldn't find her in anything after the mid-1950's.
Though I sort of liked how Howard let the Nazi unload his gun at him
Yes: and that proves he isn't the coward that Hirth called him, if either he or the audience needed confirmation. But that he then beats the tar out of the Nazi? A little overkill.
Then I looked at The New York Times first thing to-day and saw two Picassos were just stolen.
From his granddaughter? Oh, no points for that.
no subject
Ah. I don't think it registered with me because I hadn't seen The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp yet--which was the first movie I remember seeing him in.
As much as I like Roger Livesey, I genuinely can't imagine him in the role; I know actors can play successfully against type, but I'm not sure his Colpeper would have had that same initial, glacial charge.
I completely agree.
I just remember there seemed to be a whole slew of films where if you needed a villain, hello, Nazis! They were like cinematic shorthand for pure evil, so you didn't need to worry about the ethical implications of blowing them up, or something.
I see what you mean. It's true. I think there's something more solid about an army of Nazis than an army of Murderers.
But they're so much scarier when human . . .
Hmm. I'm not sure I agree. But I'm too dim just now to expound . . . I'll come back to this.
But that he then beats the tar out of the Nazi? A little overkill.
Yeah. Not to mention he looked too scrawny to so easily overpower the guy--I have the same problem whenever I see James Stewart or Clint Eastwood in a fistfight. That's one of the things I like about John Wayne--the guy's huge, and genuinely looks like he'd be formidable in hand to hand combat.
no subject
TCM is showing "I Know Where I'm Going!" on the 8th, if you're interested—it was my introduction to Roger Livesey, and I like him very much in it.
no subject
As if you need to ask. I'm absolutely interested. Thanks for letting me know.
no subject
Welcome. Let me know what you think.
no subject
Okay--I said I'd come back to this, so here I am.
I guess all I really meant to say is that while I think the Nazis are more disturbing on a sort of philosophical level if one can see hints of ones own personality in them, I think in general terms of the word "scary", whether or not the Nazis are scary would have less to do with them being human or not than how they're used. Though, of course, the less human they are, the less Nazi they are. For example, I thought Kroenen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kroenen) in the film version of Hellboy was a scary fellow without having much in the way of character (aside from being referred to as someone addicted to performing surgery on himself). But at the same time, I don't remember him holding any Nazi characteristics aside from brutality and swastikas.
I guess what I'm saying is that there's something to be said for physical menace.